Ah, the noble Sui Foundation, clad in their armor of neutrality, has declared their intent to stand aloof as the community prepares to decide the fate of a princely sumā$162 million, to be preciseāstolen by the latest digital bandits of Cetus fame. One might wonder if they are pondering whether virtue resides in action or mere indifference. š§
Meanwhile, the blockchain insists on its perpetual game of “Whoās in charge?”āa governance vote looms, daring to determine whether the funds should be restored without tearing apart the very fabric of their digital universe. A tricky moral riddle, would you not agree?
Sui Validators Play HeroāOr Do They? š¦øāāļø
In a swift ballet of digital somnambulism, Sui validators took immediate action, freezing the stolen assets faster than you can say “blockchain hero.” Over a third of these guardians, wielding the power of configuration files that could ignore certain addresses, effectively sealed off roughly $162 million worth of illicit treasures from the attackerās greedy paws. š©āØ
On Wednesday, the Sui validator community acted quickly to freeze $162M of the stolen funds. Hereās how that happened:
ā Each validator has a configuration file that allows it to ignore transactions from a specific address.
ā Adding addresses to this file is at the discretionā¦
ā Sui (@SuiNetwork) May 23, 2025
Yes, each validator holds the supreme power to choose whom to ignoreāimagine the endless fun of digital selective deafness! While they managed to block some of the loot from fleeing into the horizon, roughly $60 million had already embarked on its escaped adventureāprobably off to buy a yacht or two. Cetus, ever the diligent neighbor, is teaming up with security firms and law enforcementābecause nothing says “trust” quite like a global manhunt for digital pirates. š“āā ļø
The noble Sui Foundation, in their infinite wisdom, set forth two conditions for their neutrality: first, to remain impartial in the sacred community vote; second, for Cetus to pledge every penny toward full restitutionābecause, after all, whatās a little theft among friends? They insist, with the seriousness of a Victorian moralist, that this is a matter of āextraordinary need,ā and Cetus, ever the gracious penitent, agrees to abide by community verdicts.
They also mentioned that “no one can make this decision unilaterally,” highlighting the democratic chaosāwhere validators and SUI token stakers will decide the fate of fortunes. Oh, and Cetus even tossed in a $6 million bounty for the hackerābecause why not bribe the villain at the end of the day? š¤
In the grand theatre of decentralization, one wonders if cynics are born or merely created by the endless spectacle of power, money, and the occasional digital heist. šš°
Read More
2025-05-24 15:05