2025 Has Been a Great Year for Stephen King Movies – but With 1 Glaring Problem

by

Looking back on 2025, it’s been a really good year for movies, with something memorable in almost every genre and several films already being considered for Oscars. Stephen King was a major success story when it came to book-to-film adaptations. While his work is often adapted for the screen – and remade every few years – his stories consistently offer compelling material for filmmakers. However, despite the release of four King adaptations this year – The Monkey, The Life of Chuck, The Long Walk, and The Running Man – none of them performed as well as the studios had hoped. Although these films received positive reviews and generated excitement at festivals, they didn’t become big hits with audiences. This raises the question of why these well-made King adaptations are struggling to connect with a wider audience.

While all four films received positive reviews and attracted dedicated fans, they weren’t widely known. The Monkey generated the most discussion, though opinions were divided, largely because it surprised many viewers with its unique approach. The other films likely appealed mainly to Stephen King’s existing fanbase, and most general moviegoers were probably unaware they even existed.

Stephen King’s 2025 Adaptations Failed to Perform at the Box Office

Okay, let’s talk about The Monkey. I can see why critics were into it, even though it wasn’t a huge box office smash. Director Osgood Perkins really leaned into how ridiculous the premise was – a cursed monkey toy that basically dooms anyone who hears its cymbals – and made it this wild, over-the-top horror-comedy. It’s messy, super violent, and has this really dark, strange sense of humor. Financially, it did okay; with a $10-11 million budget, it made around $68 million worldwide. So it wasn’t a flop, but it didn’t become a mainstream hit either. The opening weekend brought in $14 million, which is decent, but not enough to make everyone rush out to see it. I think the biggest reason is that it’s hard to categorize – it’s not pure horror, and it’s not a straight comedy. That artistic choice is cool, but it definitely limited who would go see it.

Unlike most Stephen King adaptations, The Life of Chuck is a deeply personal and unconventional film, which likely explains both its critical acclaim and its lack of mainstream success. Director Mike Flanagan wasn’t interested in simply recreating King’s story; he used it as a starting point for a more introspective and emotionally resonant drama. The film unfolds in a unique, reverse chronological order, demanding patience and engagement from the viewer. While critics praised it, general audiences stayed away, resulting in disappointing box office numbers – just $6.7 million domestically and $19 million worldwide. A limited release and confusing marketing didn’t help, with many viewers unsure what the film was even about, even after seeing the trailer. The fact that Stephen King himself publicly urged people to go see it highlights how disconnected the film was from those who might have enjoyed it.

Francis Lawrence’s The Long Walk was a bit different from other films. Critics and dedicated fans both appreciated it, a rare alignment. The movie presents a gritty, punk-inspired dystopian world, focusing more on the characters’ internal struggles than big action sequences. It follows fifty teenagers compelled to walk until they physically can’t go on – it’s a tough, unsettling, and emotionally demanding watch. While it earned a respectable $11 million domestically and $62 million worldwide on a $20 million budget – making it financially successful – it didn’t become a massive cultural phenomenon. This is largely because the film caters to viewers seeking intense, challenging stories (reflected in its 88% Rotten Tomatoes score), but doesn’t offer the lighthearted escape that many audiences currently prefer. In a market saturated with blockbuster franchises and fast-paced action, a serious and somber dystopian film struggles to gain widespread attention.

The recent remake of The Running Man seemed like a sure thing – and that’s what makes its performance so disheartening. It had all the right elements: a director like Edgar Wright, a popular star in Glen Powell, exciting futuristic action, and a compelling competition premise. However, it hasn’t done well at the box office, earning only about $28.2 million worldwide, including $17 million domestically. For a big-budget action movie with such strong credentials, that’s a significant underperformance. While the film looks good and Powell is currently very popular, that hasn’t translated into ticket sales. This shows that simply turning a Stephen King story into an action movie doesn’t guarantee an audience anymore. There are just too many movies competing for attention, and mid-level blockbusters are quickly forgotten.

Stephen King Adaptations Can Absolutely Succeed Again

Ultimately, these four adaptations all face the same problem: being well-made doesn’t guarantee a wide audience. Movies based on Stephen King’s work, particularly those with a strong artistic vision, aren’t made to appeal to everyone. They’re critically acclaimed and loved by dedicated fans who enjoy unique films, but that’s not enough to draw large crowds to theaters. Without something that immediately grabs a broad audience – like a memorable villain, a clear focus on horror, or a more mainstream feel – these films struggle to achieve greater success. This leaves studios in a difficult position: they have high-quality films that don’t perform well at the box office.

Is it possible to turn things around for these films? It won’t be simple, but here are a couple of ideas. First, the marketing needs to be more focused. Describing The Life of Chuck as “the new Stephen King movie” is misleading since it’s not a horror or suspense film. This causes confusion, hurts positive buzz, and prevents the right audience from discovering it. The same issue applies to The Monkey – a trailer that only highlights the over-the-top gore doesn’t convey that the film also offers atmosphere, tension, and unique character.

As a film lover, I really think release timing is huge. If you drop a really thoughtful, challenging movie – something dark, weird, or just not mainstream – right in the middle of summer blockbuster season, it’s almost guaranteed to get lost. Those kinds of films deserve a chance to breathe, maybe with a slower release or even a mix of theaters and streaming, reaching the audience who wants that type of movie. And honestly, marketing is key too. Especially with something like a Stephen King adaptation, the trailers and ads need to be honest about the film’s vibe. Trying to make it seem like something it’s not is a recipe for disaster.

Ultimately, 2025 demonstrates that Stephen King remains a hugely inspiring source for filmmakers, who continue to adapt his stories. However, translating critical acclaim and online buzz into broad audience appeal remains a challenge. A film can receive rave reviews and generate excitement, but if most people don’t go see it, its success will be limited. This situation needs to be addressed to reach wider audiences.

https://comicbook.com/movies/news/3-stephen-king-movies-that-are-secretly-connected-to-another/embed/#

Read More

2025-11-23 00:43