Details into Blake Lively‘s deposition against Justin Baldoni are coming to light.
A few days following the ex-star of “Gossip Girl” being questioned in her court case against the actor-director, her lawyers clarified the accurate account of events that transpired during her testimony on July 31st.
In a court filing dated August 4th, as reported by TopMob News, Lively’s attorney alleges that Baldoni and his legal team have disclosed confidential deposition details to tabloids, denying claims that the legal process was a public confrontation between the co-stars from the movie “It Ends With Us“.
In the court records, Lively’s lawyers stated that the story presented implied that Ms. Lively required a significant number of witnesses to testify alongside her. However, they argued that the leak gave the impression that only Baldoni and his attorney, Bryan Freedman, were present for the deposition on their side, implying an imbalance in representation.
As per Lively’s attorney’s assertion, it was confirmed that Baldoni and Freedman were present in the room along with other defendants mentioned in her lawsuit – executives from Wayfarer Studios, Jamey Heath and Steve Sarowitz, publicist Jennifer Abel, and crisis PR specialist Melissa Nathan. Additionally, their respective lawyers were also there.
In their argument, Lively’s lawyers suggested that the leak aimed to generate a sensational news event or spectacle surrounding her deposition.
In simpler terms, her advisor stated that Miss Lively deliberately chose to engage in this lawsuit, aiming to present her testimony within the framework of a legal proceeding, subject to the rules governing evidence.
TopMob News has reached out to Baldoni’s legal team for comment but hasn’t heard back.
In a recent development, the actress Blake Lively has filed a lawsuit against her co-star Armando Baldoni for sexual harassment, alleging he fostered an unpleasant work environment on their upcoming 2024 movie set. Despite Baldoni’s denial of these accusations, his counterclaim against Lively and her spouse Ryan Reynolds was dismissed in early June by the judge. The judge found that Baldoni had not provided sufficient evidence to support the claim that the couple had harmed his reputation.
Lively has filed a lawsuit against Wayfarer Studios, Nathan, and Abel, accusing them of orchestrating a malicious campaign intended as retaliation for her bringing up issues related to Baldoni. However, the defendants have countered by stating they did not intentionally attempt to harm Lively’s reputation.
For more about Lively and Baldoni’s legal saga, keep reading…
Four months following the cinema release of Colleen Hoover’s book adaptation “It Ends With Us,” Blake Lively submitted a complaint to the California Civil Rights Department (CRD) against her costar Justin Baldoni and his associates on December 20th, as reported by The New York Times.
In the complaint obtained by TopMob News, Baldoni, Wayfarer Studios, its CEO Jamey Heath, cofounder Steve Sarowitz, Baldoni’s publicist Jennifer Abel, RWA Communications, crisis communications specialist Melissa Nathan, The Agency Group PR LLC (TAG), contractor Jed Wallace, and Street Relations Inc. were named as defendants.
Lively claimed in her complaint that Baldoni and his Wayfarer associates initiated a complex press and digital strategy in retaliation for expressing concerns about alleged misconduct on set. She stated that she and other cast and crew members “experienced intrusive, unwelcome, unprofessional, and sexually inappropriate behavior” by Baldoni and Heath.
The actress further asserted that this alleged campaign against her resulted in significant personal and professional damage. The charges outlined in the complaint include sexual harassment, retaliation, neglecting to investigate, prevent, or rectify harassment, aiding and abetting harassment and retaliation, breach of contract, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligence, false light invasion of privacy, and interference with prospective economic advantage.
On the following day, The New York Times released an exposé detailing a supposed counterattack smear operation that Baldoni and his allies were accused of executing against Lively, backing their claims with her CRD complaint. In its report, the newspaper shared correspondence between Baldoni, Abel (his publicist), Nathan (crisis communications expert) and others, as outlined in her complaint. The Times’ website provided access to the related court documents for readers to review. Lively expressed hope that her legal action would shed light on these underhanded retaliatory strategies aimed at silencing those speaking out about misconduct, and safeguard others potentially targeted in a similar manner.
—Reporting by Sara Ouerfelli
Following the disclosure of Lively’s complaint, Bryan Freedman – legal representative for Baldoni, Wayfarer, and their associates – forcefully denied Lively’s accusations. In a statement on The New York Times website, he stated, “It’s regrettable that Ms. Lively and her team would level such grave and factually incorrect allegations against Mr. Baldoni, Wayfarer Studios, and their representatives. This appears to be another desperate attempt to repair her damaged reputation stemming from her own statements and actions during the movie’s promotional campaign; interviews and press activities that were publicly accessible, unedited, and allowed for public opinion to form. These claims are entirely false, excessively sensational, and deliberately salacious with the aim of causing harm and perpetuating a media narrative.”
Freedman also defended Wayfarer’s choice to engage a crisis manager, explaining that this was done prior to the film’s marketing campaign. He later clarified, “The representatives of Wayfarer Studios took no proactive measures nor retaliated, only addressing incoming media inquiries to ensure accurate and fair reporting and monitoring social activity. What is notably absent from the selectively presented correspondence is proof that no active measures were taken with the media or otherwise; merely internal strategic planning and private communication, which is standard practice for public relations professionals.
After the publication of an article by The New York Times on December 21, talent agency William Morris Endeavor (WME) ended its association with Baldoni. Ari Emanuel, CEO of the agency’s parent company Endeavor, confirmed this to the outlet. However, it is important to note that WME denies Ryan Reynolds, Lively’s husband and a client represented by WME, was responsible for the separation between WME and Baldoni. This allegation was made later in a lawsuit filed by Baldoni against The New York Times (more details on that below). In a statement to The Hollywood Reporter on January 1, WME clarified that Baldoni’s former representative was not present at the Deadpool & Wolverine premiere and no pressure from Reynolds or Lively was ever exerted to drop Baldoni as a client.
After Lively’s CRD filing and an article by The New York Times, various well-known figures voiced their support for her accusations against Baldoni. Among them was the author of ‘It Ends With Us’, Hoover.
On Instagram Stories on December 21st, Hoover expressed: “@blakelively, you have always been honest, kind, supportive and patient since we first met. Thank you for being exactly who you are. Never change. Never wilt.”
Jenny Slate, who portrayed Baldoni’s character Ryle’s sister, also declared her backing for Lively. On December 23rd, she released a statement to Today: “As Blake Lively’s castmate and friend, I voice my support as she takes action against those reported to have planned and carried out an attack on her reputation.”
Slate added: “Blake is a leader, loyal friend, and a trusted source of emotional support for me and many who know and love her. What has been revealed about the attack on Blake is terribly dark, disturbing, and wholly threatening. I commend my friend, I admire her bravery, and I stand by her side.”
Brandon Sklenar-a love interest for Lively’s character Lily Bloom-shared a screenshot of the complaint published on The New York Times’ website and linked out to the outlet with the message: “For the love of God read this.”
Lastly, Lively’s Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants co-stars America Ferrera, Alexis Bledel, and Amber Tamblyn stated they “stand with her in solidarity.
Liz Plank recently shared on Instagram that she is no longer co-hosting “The Man Enough Podcast” with Baldoni and Heath. In her post, she expressed gratitude for the trust and support from listeners, stating that she will miss them dearly. She also emphasized the values they built together and their commitment to creating a better future. Although Plank didn’t disclose the reason for leaving the podcast, it followed closely after Lively’s complaint against Baldoni and his associates at Wayfarer. In her message, she reaffirmed her dedication to fighting injustice and holding those accountable. She also mentioned that she would share more about the situation soon as she continues to process everything that has happened.
In a lawsuit filed on December 24th in New York, Stephanie Jones, Baldoni’s former publicist, and her agency Jonesworks LLC accused Baldoni, his company Wayfarer, his current publicist Abel, crisis communications specialist Nathan, and previously employed Abel of conspiring against Jones for months. The accusation includes publicly and privately attacking Jones, breaching contracts, inducing contractual breaches, and stealing clients and business opportunities.
The lawsuit also claims that Abel and Nathan secretly coordinated with Baldoni and Wayfarer to launch a smear campaign against one of Baldoni’s film co-stars, using it as an opportunity to drive a wedge between Jones and Baldoni, and to blame Jones for the smear campaign when she had no involvement.
Abel, who worked at Jonesworks until last summer according to her LinkedIn profile, is accused of falsely pointing fingers at Jones now that their misconduct is being exposed, defaming, and attacking her in the industry.
Baldoni and Wayfarer, who are no longer Jonesworks’ clients, are alleged to have breached their contractual obligations with Jonesworks and refused to settle this dispute privately through arbitration.
TopMob News reached out to the defendants for comment.
In a statement to Variety on December 23rd, Lively’s legal team revealed they acquired the texts mentioned in The New York Times article through a subpoena sent to Jonesworks. Freedman, who represents Nathan, Abel, Baldoni, and their Wayfarer associates, further stated that none of his clients were served a subpoena concerning this matter. He also expressed his intention to sue Jones for disclosing texts from Abel’s phone to Lively’s legal team.
Baldoni, Wayfarer, Heath, Sarowitz, Nathan, TAG, Abel, RWA Communications, Wallace and Street Relations filed a lawsuit against The New York Times Dec. 31.
In the lawsuit obtained by TopMob News, The New York Times is accused of libel, false light invasion of privacy, promissory fraud and breach of implied-in-fact contract for its article about a retaliatory smear campaign the plaintiffs allegedly conducted against Lively after she voiced concerns about purported misconduct on set.
Saying the report was “false” and based on Lively’s CRD complaint, the plaintiffs denied the accusations and alleged messages cited in the article and complaint were taken out of context.
“Despite its claim to have ‘reviewed these along with other documents[,]’ the Times relied almost entirely on Lively’s unverified and self-serving narrative,” the lawsuit says, “lifting it nearly verbatim while disregarding an abundance of evidence that contradicted her claims and exposed her true motives.”
They also allege “it was Lively, not Plaintiffs, who engaged in a calculated smear campaign.” She has denied this.
The New York Times said it plans to “vigorously defend against the lawsuit.”
“The role of an independent news organization is to follow the facts where they lead,” it stated to TopMob. “Our story was meticulously and responsibly reported. It was based on a review of thousands of pages of original documents, including the text messages and emails that we quote accurately and at length in the article.”
On that very day, Lively initiated a legal action against Baldoni, Wayfarer, Heath, Sarowitz, It Ends With Us Movie LLC, Nathan, his company TAG, and Abel in New York. As stated in court documents acquired by TopMob News, she is accusing the defendants of sexual harassment, retaliation, neglecting to investigate and address harassment, aiding and abetting such actions, breach of contract, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligent infliction of emotional distress, and invasion of privacy through false light.
The accusations in the lawsuit mirror those made in the CRD complaint Lively filed earlier that month. In response to the lawsuit filed against them, Baldoni and his associates counter-sued _The New York Times_, which does not include Lively as a defendant. Lively’s lawyers responded to TopMob by stating that “the claims made in this lawsuit do not alter anything regarding the allegations in her CRD and federal complaints.”
They further clarified that “the premise that Lively’s administrative complaint against Wayfarer and others was a deceitful strategy to avoid filing a lawsuit against Baldoni, Wayfarer, and that litigation was never her ultimate goal is false.” As evidenced by the federal complaint filed by Lively today, this rationale for the lawsuit against Wayfarer is incorrect.
In their legal action against The New York Times, Baldoni and his colleagues have made it clear that they intend to continue taking action. According to the court documents, there are more parties involved in the wrongdoing, and it’s important to note that this won’t be their only lawsuit. In a January 2 interview with NBC News, Baldoni’s attorney Freedman confirmed that they indeed plan to file a lawsuit against Lively.
The conversation surrounding Baldoni and Lively hasn’t ended yet. For example, some social media users have suggested that Reynolds may have teased Baldoni in his film “Deadpool & Wolverine” through the character Nicepool.
Reynolds has not spoken publicly about these rumors, but Baldoni’s lawyer Freedman shared his thoughts on the matter. During an interview on “The Megyn Kelly Show,” posted to YouTube on January 7, he said, “In my opinion, if your wife is sexually harassed, you don’t make light of Justin Baldoni’s situation. You take it seriously. You file complaints and follow a legal process. What you don’t do is make fun of the person and turn it into a joke.
Following Lively’s lawsuit, her lawyers assert that she has faced additional instances of harassment rather than being embroiled in a dispute. In a statement to TopMob News on January 7th, they explained that the case before the Southern District of New York concerns severe allegations of sexual harassment and retaliation, supported by substantial evidence. This is not a disagreement over creative differences or a he-said-she-said situation, as Wayfarer and their associates are accused of engaging in unlawful retaliatory tactics against Lively for standing up for herself and others on the film set. Since the lawsuit was filed, these individuals have continued to attack Lively.
As the legal process unfolds, her lawyers urge everyone to remember that sexual harassment and retaliation are prohibited in all workplaces and industries. A common tactic to divert attention from such misconduct is to accuse the victim of inviting or instigating it, or even of lying. Another approach is to swap the roles of the victim and offender, claiming that the perpetrator is actually the one being wronged. These tactics serve to minimize and trivialize serious allegations of misconduct. The lawyers also emphasized that media statements are not a defense against Lively’s claims, and they plan to pursue her case in court.
In a lawsuit filed on January 16th in New York, Baldoni, Heath, Wayfarer, Abel, Nathan, and It Ends With Us Movie LLC sued Lively, Reynolds, Leslie Sloane (Lively’s publicist), and Vision PR. The plaintiffs claim that all defendants engaged in civil extortion, defamation, and false light invasion of privacy.
Lively and Reynolds are specifically accused of breaching an implied covenant of good faith, interfering with contractual relations, and causing economic harm through intentional and negligent actions. The plaintiffs deny Lively’s claims of sexual harassment and a retaliatory smear campaign against her. Instead, they allege that she seized control of It Ends With Us, collaborated with Reynolds, Sloane, Jones, and others to harm the plaintiffs’ reputation in the press following negative feedback on Lively’s promotion of the film (which she claims was done according to Sony’s marketing plan).
In the lawsuit, plaintiffs claim that defendants collaborated with The New York Times to publish a sensational news story that was both damaging and untrue. The outlet maintains its confidence in the report.
In response to TopMob’s inquiry, Freedman stated, “Either Blake Lively was deceived by her team or she deliberately lied about the truth.
Lively’s legal team referred to his lawsuit as “a common tactic in the script of an abuser,” stating to TopMob News that “This situation follows a familiar pattern: A woman presents solid proof of sexual harassment and reprisal, and the abuser tries to shift the blame onto the victim. This behavior is often known as DARVO, which stands for Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim Offender.
Additionally, she asserted that he reacted adversely after her accusations by attempting to change the focus of the situation, suggesting that Peter Baldoni is trying to divert blame, implying that Blake Lively took charge creatively and estranged the cast from him.
The discussion proceeded by stating, “The proof will reveal that both the cast members and others had unfavorable encounters with Mr. Baldoni and Wayfarer. Furthermore, it will be demonstrated that Sony requested Ms. Lively to manage their portion of the film, which was subsequently chosen for distribution and turned out to be a massive hit.
Her team went on to slam Baldoni’s reaction to her allegations of harassment.
In a nutshell, when faced with sexual harassment accusations, they attempted to shift blame onto her by implying she desired it and was at fault. Similarly, their explanation for why this happened to her centered around her clothing choice. Essentially, while the victim is preoccupied with the abuse, the abuser concentrates on deflecting responsibility. This approach of blaming the woman is desperate, as it does not counteract the evidence presented in Ms. Lively’s complaint and will ultimately fall short.
As a diehard fan, I couldn’t contain my excitement when Baldoni’s legal team unveiled never-before-seen footage from the making of “It Ends With Us.” The actor’s actions in this video, they claimed, utterly debunked Amber Lively’s portrayal of him. It’s like having a secret peek into the truth behind the scenes!
In a released statement, Baldoni’s legal team explained that the depicted situation was intended to convey the blossoming love between the characters and their desire for closeness. It is evident from their performances that both actors adhered to their roles appropriately, demonstrating respect and professionalism throughout.
Nonetheless, Lively’s legal representatives argue that the video aligns completely with what Miss Lively stated in her lawsuit, claiming that each moment depicted was spontaneously created by Mr. Baldoni without any prior conversation or agreement.
The video depicts Ms. Lively pulling back and continually requesting that the characters converse instead, as stated to TopMob News. A sense of unease similar to that experienced by any woman subjected to unwanted physical contact at work can be seen in Ms. Lively’s demeanor.
In simpler terms, they wrote a letter to the presiding judge during their trial, asking for the attorney leading Baldoni’s defense team, known as Freedman, to be restricted from speaking publicly about the case, in order to prevent any inappropriate behavior.
As a lifestyle expert, I’d put it this way: During the filming of “It Ends With Us,” I came across a seven-minute voice memo supposedly sent by the director that surfaced online. In this recording, he seems to discuss the movie’s pivotal rooftop scene which, as you may recall, was rewritten by the talented actress Emily Blunt. The memo hints at a meeting between the director, Ryan Reynolds, and our beloved Taylor Swift where the changes in that scene were reportedly presented.
He said, “It’s wonderful to have friends as imaginative as them, who are also among the most creative individuals globally.” To him, the trio is extraordinary when they’re together; it’s simply amazing.
In the recording, it appeared that Baldoni also seemed to apologize to the actress for not being more enthusiastic about her script. He said, “I made a mistake. Here’s something important to know about me: I will acknowledge and apologize when I fall short.
Approximately a month following the submission of Lively’s legal complaint against Baldoni, a trial date was established on March 9, 2026, by the court.
According to reports from TopMob News, Baldoni’s legal team has updated their January 16th counter-suit filed in the U.S. District Court against Lively, Reynolds, and Sloane to also involve The New York Times.
In the revised paperwork, Baldoni alleged that Lively and her associates were involved in a secretive alliance for several months, spreading untruths to The New York Times.
In a different case, distinct from the $250 million lawsuit against the New York Times, it was claimed that the paper selectively chose and manipulated communications, removing important context, and intentionally edited them to deceive.
Baldoni established a site detailing his lawsuit against Lively, which includes the first amended complaint submitted on January 31 by his legal team, along with a “chronology of significant events.” The details in this chronology reportedly include screenshots of text conversations between Lively, Reynolds, and Baldoni.
The website went live a month following Freedman’s announcement that they would make public every text message exchange between the two parties.
In a January 2 interview with NBC News, Baldoni’s lawyer expressed that they desire transparency and want all relevant documents to be made public. They believe people should form their own opinions using the available evidence or proof.
Lawyers for Lively submitted a revised lawsuit statement, asserting that two additional female crew members from the set of “It Ends” had expressed discomfort due to Baldoni’s conduct on the job.
TopMob News obtained a complaint stating that Ms. Lively wasn’t the only one voicing concerns about Mr. Baldoni. The complaint, which was filed starting in May 2023, recorded incidents involving Ms. Lively and other individuals. It’s worth noting that contrary to the story the Defendants have spun, Mr. Baldoni admitted to receiving complaints about his behavior in writing at the time of these incidents, acknowledging that he was aware that women besides Ms. Lively were uncomfortable with him.
In my account, for safety reasons and to shield them from potential harm caused by the defendants’ reprisal effort, which has escalated threat, harassment, and intimidation, I purposefully omitted naming the two individuals who are prepared to testify in this case.
As a trusted voice in lifestyle matters, I find myself compelled to address an issue that has recently arisen. In my opinion, the grievance at hand appears overly reliant on mere conjecture and unverified accounts – what I would term as “unsubstantiated hearsay.” Regrettably, it seems those who claim to hold pertinent information are now unwilling or unable to step forward, thereby undermining the credibility of the allegations.
Following Baldoni’s allegations against Sloane for spreading “harmful tales” that depicted him as a “sexual harasser” and for organizing a “defamatory campaign” at Lively’s behest, Sloane submitted a motion to dismiss the legal case.
As an over-the-moon fan, I can’t help but share some intriguing insights from the TopMob News documents. My beloved Sloane’s legal team argued that there was no substantial ground for the allegations levied against her. Instead, it seems she was unwillingly pulled into this lawsuit, a clever smokescreen tactic apparently aimed at diverting attention away from the accusations directed towards Lively.
Last week, it was announced that Nick Shapiro, who previously served as Deputy Chief of Staff at the CIA, has joined Lively’s legal team to offer guidance on their strategic approach to communications related to the ongoing sexual harassment and retaliation lawsuit in the Southern District of New York. This information was shared by a representative from Willkie Farr & Gallagher, Lively’s litigation team.
Shapiro, who served for the CIA from 2013 to 2015 during the Obama administration, subsequently held positions as Visa’s vice president of worldwide security and communications, followed by Airbnb’s global head of crisis management. After spending three years at the rental firm, he established his own consulting company, 10th Avenue Consulting LLC.
TopMob News reports that The New York Times, currently involved in a $250 million lawsuit with Baldoni, has submitted a request to be released from a separate $400 million lawsuit that additionally involves Lively, Baldoni, and Sloane.
In their court submission, the newspaper contended that Baldoni’s team was spinning a “single perspective story that has attracted much attention,” but insisted that “The Times should not be involved in this legal matter.
In response to a motion from The New York Times, U.S. District Judge Lewis J. Liman has agreed to postpone the discovery process, as reported by TopMob News based on obtained documents.
The court granted a temporary hold on the exchange of information or documents between parties, as per the newspaper’s motion filed on February 28th, which is currently under review by the judge.
In a document dated March 4, Liman indicated that the New York Times has provided “solid evidence” and “convincingly demonstrated” that their motion to dismiss is probable to be granted based on its merits.
Additionally, the judge stated that he doesn’t think Baldoni’s legal team would be unduly disadvantaged if the court chooses to delay proceedings (i.e., “stay”) while it considers the upcoming motion.
In response to TopMob News, a representative from the New York Times stated their gratitude for today’s court decision, which they believe upholds the significant First Amendment principles involved. They also pointed out that the court has prevented Mr. Baldoni from overwhelming The Times with discovery requests in a lawsuit that, in their opinion, should not have been initiated against them.
Following allegations by Baldoni that Lively was exploiting her friendship with Taylor Swift to gain greater creative authority over It Ends With Us, prompting his legal team to demand a subpoena of the singer, a representative for Swift countered.
According to a statement released by Taylor Swift’s representative on May 9th, Taylor Swift has not taken part in this movie at all. She had no role in casting or making creative decisions, didn’t compose the music for the film, and hasn’t watched any edits nor provided feedback on it.
Taylor Swift was associated with this movie because one of her songs, ‘My Tears Ricochet,’ was featured. However, the subpoena requesting documents is trying to exploit Taylor Swift’s name for increased public attention, rather than focusing on the actual facts of the case, as she was among 19 other artists who licensed songs for the film.
Baldoni’s attorneys withdrew their request later that month, per Lively’s legal team.
In this case, the judge ruled in favor of Lively, Reynolds, and their publicist, as Baldoni and his lawyers were unable to provide sufficient evidence that the couple had defamed him. Additionally, the judge tossed out Baldoni’s lawsuit against The New York Times.
On Instagram Stories, Lively expressed her feelings about experiencing a retaliatory lawsuit, stating, “Just like countless others, I’ve known the anguish of such legal battles, along with the false sense of shame designed to undermine us.” She added, “Though the lawsuit against me was dismissed, many people lack the means to defend themselves in similar situations.
She said, “I express my affection and thanks to those who have been by my side. Some of you are familiar faces, others are new, but I will always cherish and champion each one of you.
Simultaneously, Baldoni’s lawyer informed TopMob News with a statement saying that Lively’s claim of victory was unfounded and predictable.
The attorney stated that this case revolves around unfounded claims of sexual harassment and reprisal, along with an alleged baseless smear campaign. Interestingly, Ms. Lively’s own group labels it as ‘untraceable’ since they can’t substantiate events that supposedly didn’t occur.
In simpler terms, Lively had a meeting at her lawyers’ office in New York for a deposition. Contrary to some media reports suggesting a heated confrontation between Lively and Baldoni, her legal team later disputed the claim that she required a big group of people to testify, stating that such a narrative was misleading.
According to Lively’s argument, it was a fact that Baldoni was present in the room, along with the other defendants mentioned in her lawsuit and their lawyers.
Read More
- Wrestler Marcus “Buff” Bagwell Undergoes Leg Amputation
- Powell’s Exit? A Financial Drama! 🎭
- Xbox’s Forza Horizon 5 Sold an Outrageous 2 Million Copies on PS5 in a Month
- Gold Rate Forecast
- Anime’s Greatest Summer 2024 Shonen Hit Drops New Look Ahead of Season 2
- xAI’s $300/month Grok 4, billed as a “maximally truth-seeking AI” — seemingly solicits Elon Musk’s opinion on controversial topics
- President Trump: “What the hell is NVIDIA? I’ve never heard of it before” — but is it right to dunk on him?
- Spy x Family’s Biggest Cliffhanger May Lead to Nothing
- IEM Cologne 2025 Pick’Em Challenge: Predict, Compete, and Win with xPlay.gg
- How Much Does a PS5 Equivalent PC Cost in 2025?
2025-08-05 01:19