REVIEW: “River of Blood” (2025)

In the beginning, “River of Blood” takes us deep into the dense jungles of Southeast Asia, where a group of Australian loggers meet their brutal end at the hands of an enigmatic tribe. This establishes the scene for a visually appealing yet disappointingly superficial horror-thriller directed by Howard J. Ford. It boasts all the elements of a classic exploitation film, but despite some graphic violence, it feels like it’s treading carefully on the edge of danger.

Tom Boyle penned the script for “River of Blood,” a film that unfolds around an intriguing foundation. Shot on-site in Thailand, the backdrop of lush jungle provides a stunning yet ominous setting with thick vegetation, towering trees allowing sunlight to filter through gaps, and a narrow, twisting river running its course. As the aesthetic beauty transforms into danger, Ford skillfully executes intense violence that aligns perfectly with the story’s narrative.

However, the issues quickly emerge due to poorly developed characters and shallow relationships. The film tries to create a backstory for them and generate tension through the unfolding drama. Yet, the jealousy, resentment, and deceit appear insubstantial, almost melodramatic. More substantial themes like deforestation and indigenous culture are barely scratched, while their numerous unwise choices move the plot forward but make them seem incredibly incompetent.

Four stylish and unquestionably affluent companions are enjoying a vacation together in Southeast Asia. These include Ajay, known as Louis James, along with his wife Maya, Ella Starbuck; Ritchie, David Wayman, and his spouse Jasmine, Sarah Alexandra Marks. The longtime college friends Ajay and Ritchie share a bond, yet it’s evident that Ajay harbors feelings of insecurity towards Ritchie’s prosperity. Equally apparent is the hinted romantic involvement between Ajay and Jasmine.

The original four companions opt to embark on a kayak journey through the wilderness with Nick (Joseph Millson) as their guide, initially planning a day trip. However, Nick unexpectedly transforms their outing into an overnight excursion. Initially, Ajay’s arrogant demeanor and frequent eyerolls notwithstanding, the experience appears delightful as they paddle down the picturesque river, marveling at the untouched splendor of the jungle. But this idyllic scene shifts dramatically once they establish their nighttime camp.

The hidden conflicts within the couple escalate, leading one individual to make a foolish decision and depart alone. The others then set out to locate their absent companion, unknowingly venturing into territory inhabited by a fierce cannibal tribe. Before long, these pampered travelers find themselves pursued by the tribe’s leader (Nelson Mahodi), who is on the hunt for his tribe’s next meal.

The narrative heavily emphasizes its theme of predator versus prey, resulting in some intense scenes, albeit reaching these moments may involve navigating through some less-than-engaging character interactions. The actors give their best performances and their physical dedication is notable, suggesting they are capable of tackling more profound and complex material, but unfortunately, such depth never fully materializes.

Despite its imperfections, “River of Blood” effectively achieves its primary objective: to provide an entertaining experience for viewers. Running at just 87 minutes, the film seldom allows us to ponder on its weaknesses. For dedicated horror enthusiasts, overlooking the flaws will come naturally. This is due to Ford’s adherence to the horror genre tropes and his generous use of gore. However, I can’t help but feel that the movie could have been more daring. A touch more risk might have significantly enhanced its impact.

Read More

2025-08-15 18:23