Epstein’s Crypto Ghost Haunts Bitcoin: 20,000 Docs Spill the Tea ☕️

Ah, the whispers of the damned! Over the past week, the shadows have grown longer, and the air thicker with the murmurs of 20,000 documents-a deluge unleashed by the U.S. House Oversight Committee, tied to the specter of Jeffrey Epstein, that convicted harbinger of ruin. Now, the crypto world, ever so eager to dance with the devil, has fixated on Epstein’s peculiar fascination with Bitcoin, a topic that surfaces like a corpse in a moonlit river, again and again, through the murky depths of these records.

Epstein’s Crypto Trail: A Dance of Shadows and Ledger Entries

It was no secret, of course, that Epstein-that wretched soul-had a soft spot for Bitcoin. Reports had long whispered of his dalliances with the MIT Media Lab, his tendrils reaching into the Digital Currency Initiative (DCI), like a spider spinning a web of intrigue. 🕸️

Ah, but who better to illuminate these “sinister links” than Aaron Day, that modern-day Cassandra, whose report in January 2024 tied Epstein and Bitcoin in a noose of words. The latest documents, a torrent of revelations, only tighten this knot, with Bitcoin’s name echoing through the archives like a cursed refrain. Courier Newsroom, ever the diligent gravedigger, has turned this cache into a searchable database, a tool for the curious and the damned alike.

The trove, oh what a trove! It reveals that Joichi Ito, former director of the MIT Media Lab, sought funding for his Digital Currency Initiative, and that Epstein, like a shadow puppeteer, indirectly funneled money to Bitcoin Core developers. Emails, articles, whispers-all forwarded, all saved, all damning. 🖤

An email from Epstein to Joichi Ito, a ghostly correspondence. Source: U.S. House Oversight Committee data dump.

On social media, the clamor has reached a fever pitch, with Epstein’s Bitcoin ties trending like a plague on X. Some argue that linking Bitcoin to Epstein is a Machiavellian ploy, a psychological gambit to sully its name and divert attention from its virtues. “By welding it to the bleakest imagery imaginable,” one observer remarked, “the aim is to stir emotions, to tilt public sentiment, to pry people from their precious Bitcoin.” Others, with a shrug and a smirk, call it “mid-story contamination,” a rehashing of old wounds. “Bitcoin survived this mess before,” they insist, “and it will again.” 🤷‍♂️

But Aaron Day, that relentless seeker of truth, refuses to let the matter rest. “Whether the news is old or not,” he posted, “it demands answers. Perhaps, I will do a podcast on it next week.” And he adds, with a flourish of drama: “DCI funded all 3 US CBDC pilots while hobbling Bitcoin. One of the Bitcoin core devs, Cory Fields, is a co-author on Project Hamilton. I guarantee you, almost NO ONE knows this.” 🕵️‍♂️

For now, the Epstein discussions rage on, a tempest in a teacup, with some crying distraction and others demanding accountability. What’s clear is that the conversation has cracked open a Pandora’s box of scrutiny, forcing us to confront the ghosts of crypto’s past. As the details resurface, the pressure mounts for clarity, transparency, and a reckoning. Who shaped early crypto research? And why? The answers, like Bitcoin itself, are both elusive and inevitable. 🌪️

Read More

2025-11-16 01:58