Beyond Quantum Volume: Measuring How ‘Quantum’ Your Computer Truly Is

Author: Denis Avetisyan

A new benchmarking method leverages mid-circuit parity measurements to assess the degree of non-classicality in quantum computers, offering a more nuanced metric than traditional quantum volume.

Researchers demonstrate a scalable, macrorealism-based approach to quantify quantumness by verifying violations of classical realism through parity measurements.

Scaling quantum computation demands robust methods to verify and quantify quantumness as systems grow, yet current benchmarks often fall short at macroscopic levels. This need is addressed in ‘How “Quantum” is your Quantum Computer? Macrorealism-based Benchmarking via Mid-Circuit Parity Measurements’, which introduces a novel approach leveraging violations of macrorealism-the classical assumption of definite properties-through parity measurements. The study demonstrates a scalable metric for quantifying quantum behavior as qubit number increases, revealing a quantum-to-classical transition in realistic noisy quantum computers. Could this macrorealism-based benchmark offer a more foundational and insightful pathway toward assessing-and ultimately improving-the capabilities of future quantum processors?

The Evolving Landscape of Quantum Realism

The long-held belief in macrorealism, the notion that everyday objects possess well-defined properties regardless of whether they are observed, faces increasing scrutiny from the principles of quantum mechanics. This perspective suggests a fundamental objectivity – a table, for instance, maintains its shape and position even when not actively measured. However, quantum mechanics introduces the concept of superposition and entanglement, where properties exist as probabilities until measurement forces a definite state. Experiments probing the behavior of quantum systems are revealing that this classical intuition breaks down at the microscopic level, and increasingly, evidence suggests these quantum effects may not be entirely confined to the realm of atoms and particles. The implications challenge the very foundation of how reality is perceived, prompting a re-evaluation of whether definite properties are inherent to systems or emerge only through the act of measurement itself, potentially blurring the line between observer and observed.

The persistent tension between classical realism and quantum mechanics arises from a fundamental disconnect in how each describes reality. Classical physics assumes an objective universe where properties like position and momentum exist independently of observation, providing a deterministic framework for understanding the macroscopic world. However, quantum mechanics introduces inherent uncertainty – Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, for example – suggesting that these properties are not fixed until measured, and that the very act of measurement influences the system. This challenges the notion of an observer-independent reality, creating a paradox when attempting to apply quantum principles to everyday objects. While macroscopic systems appear to possess definite properties, this apparent objectivity may emerge from the collective behavior of countless quantum particles, masking the underlying probabilistic nature of reality and leaving scientists to grapple with the question of how-or even if-a definite, objective reality truly exists at the most fundamental level.

Investigating the No Disturbance Condition represents a pivotal approach to understanding the boundary between the quantum and classical realms. This principle, central to many interpretations of quantum mechanics, posits that a precise measurement of a quantum system should not inherently alter its state, allowing for predictable evolution. However, rigorously testing this condition is exceptionally challenging due to the delicate nature of quantum states and the unavoidable interaction between measuring devices and the system itself. Recent experiments employing advanced techniques, such as weak measurements and careful control of environmental noise, are designed to discern whether seemingly non-disturbing measurements truly leave the system unchanged, or if subtle disturbances contribute to the probabilistic outcomes observed in quantum mechanics. Confirming or refuting the No Disturbance Condition has profound implications, potentially necessitating revisions to the foundations of quantum theory and reshaping our understanding of how observation influences reality at the most fundamental level.

Parity Measurements: A Sensitive Probe of Quantum Systems

The Parity Non-Demolition Condition (NDC) protocol utilizes parity measurements as a means of verifying the No Disturbance Condition in quantum systems. This protocol avoids complete state collapse by measuring the parity – whether a combination of qubits is in an even or odd state – allowing for repeated, non-destructive checks. The measurement outcome provides information about the system without fully determining its state, enabling the detection of minimal disturbances that would otherwise be obscured by standard projective measurements. By repeatedly applying weak measurements and comparing the initial and final parity, researchers can rigorously test whether a quantum operation truly leaves the system undisturbed, providing a sensitive benchmark for quantum control and coherence.

Parity measurement, in the context of quantum error detection, assesses whether the combined state of multiple qubits is even or odd based on the number of qubits in the $|1\rangle$ state. This determination is achieved through collective measurement of a parity operator, which yields $+1$ for even parity and $-1$ for odd parity, without requiring individual qubit measurements. Crucially, this process does not fully project the qubits into a definite state, thus avoiding the disturbance that would occur with traditional projective measurements. The ability to discern deviations from expected parity, even without complete state collapse, provides a sensitive indicator of unwanted disturbances introduced by environmental noise or imperfect quantum gates, allowing for robust error detection and characterization of quantum systems.

Parity Non-Demolition (PND) protocols, specifically the Parity Non-Disturbance Condition (NDC) protocol, are currently being implemented on advanced quantum computing hardware, including IBM’s Marrakesh and Brisbane processors. These implementations are yielding data with significantly improved precision compared to earlier devices; specifically, observed quantumness – a measure of deviation from classical behavior – has improved by a factor of three. This enhancement is attributable to the increased coherence and reduced error rates of the newer hardware, allowing for more accurate parity measurements and a more stringent test of the No-Disturbance Condition. The precision achieved on these platforms is now sufficient to provide meaningful data for evaluating fundamental quantum mechanical principles and validating quantum hardware performance.

Refining Benchmarking Through Disturbance Cancellation

Classical disturbances pose a fundamental obstacle to accurate benchmarking of quantum systems. These disturbances, originating from environmental noise and imperfect control operations, introduce errors that can obscure or mimic genuine quantum behavior. Specifically, unwanted interactions with the environment cause decoherence, reducing the fidelity of quantum states and operations. Furthermore, classical noise can introduce spurious signals that are misinterpreted as evidence of quantum entanglement or other non-classical effects, leading to inflated performance metrics. Consequently, mitigating these classical disturbances is crucial for obtaining reliable and meaningful results from quantum benchmarking experiments and for accurately assessing the performance of quantum devices.

The H-Method builds upon the Parity Non-Demolition (NDC) Protocol by actively addressing the influence of entangling dynamics, a primary source of classical disturbance in quantum benchmarking. While the Parity NDC Protocol focuses on measuring a parity observable to infer qubit states, the H-Method incorporates specific pulse sequences designed to cancel the effects of unwanted entangling gates. This cancellation is achieved by strategically applying pulses that reverse the phase evolution induced by these entangling dynamics, effectively reducing correlated errors. By minimizing these correlations, the H-Method isolates the signal of genuine quantum behavior, leading to more accurate benchmarking results and a clearer differentiation between quantum effects and classical noise.

The M-Method builds upon disturbance cancellation techniques by introducing a mid-circuit measurement performed on a qubit initially uncorrelated with the system under test. This measurement projects the ancillary qubit into a defined state, effectively filtering out classical disturbances that would otherwise propagate and obscure quantum signals. By leveraging this additional layer of mitigation, the M-Method reduces the impact of classical noise to a level statistically indistinguishable from inherent experimental error, thereby improving the fidelity and reliability of benchmarking results for quantum systems.

Validating Quantum Foundations and Charting Future Investigations

Recent advancements have enabled a practical assessment of the No Disturbance Condition, a cornerstone of quantum mechanics, using functioning quantum hardware. The No Disturbance Condition posits that precisely measuring one property of a quantum system shouldn’t inherently disturb other, non-measured properties – a principle vital for the validity of quantum operations. Researchers have developed and implemented refined protocols allowing for rigorous experimental tests of this condition, moving beyond theoretical considerations. This successful implementation signifies a crucial step towards validating the foundations of quantum mechanics in a tangible way, opening doors to more precise quantum experiments and strengthening confidence in the principles governing the quantum realm. These tests utilize the delicate interplay of quantum states and measurements, demanding high-fidelity control over qubits and minimizing environmental noise to discern subtle violations or confirmations of the condition.

A novel benchmarking protocol has been successfully implemented, enabling the demonstration of a violation of macrorealism – the assumption that objects possess definite properties independent of measurement – using up to 38 qubits. This represents a significant leap forward in validating the foundations of quantum mechanics, as previous tests were limited by the number of qubits that could be reliably controlled. The protocol’s scalability allows for increasingly stringent tests of quantum theory against classical alternatives, pushing the boundaries of our understanding of the quantum world and providing strong evidence against the intuitive, yet ultimately inaccurate, notion that quantum systems behave like miniature versions of everyday objects. This advancement opens the door to exploring the limits of quantum mechanics with unprecedented precision and scale.

Recent experimentation leveraging IBM’s ‘Marrakesh’ quantum computer has established a new benchmark in the investigation of macrorealism – the intuitive notion that objects possess definite properties independent of measurement. Researchers successfully demonstrated a violation of this principle using up to 38 qubits, significantly surpassing the scale of prior tests. This achievement doesn’t merely extend previous results; it provides substantially stronger evidence against macrorealism, reinforcing the core tenets of quantum mechanics. The ability to probe these fundamental assumptions with increasing precision not only validates the existing quantum framework but also opens avenues for exploring potential deviations that could hint at new physics, solidifying quantum mechanics as a robust description of reality at its most fundamental level.

Continued refinement of these quantum benchmarking protocols, coupled with the inevitable progression of quantum computing hardware, holds the potential to dramatically enhance the precision of fundamental tests. Improvements in qubit coherence – the duration for which a qubit maintains its quantum state – and substantial reductions in noise will allow for experiments probing deeper into the foundations of quantum mechanics. This isn’t simply about confirming existing theories; these advancements could reveal subtle deviations from current models, potentially unlocking new physics and providing insights into the very nature of reality at the quantum level. The ability to conduct increasingly complex and accurate experiments promises a future where the bizarre and counterintuitive predictions of quantum mechanics are not just accepted, but understood with unprecedented clarity.

The pursuit of quantifiable quantumness, as detailed in this work, echoes a fundamental principle of systemic understanding. This research establishes a benchmarking method – evaluating macrorealism violations via parity measurements – that moves beyond simply achieving qubit counts. It acknowledges that the value of a quantum system isn’t solely in its complexity, but in how those components interact and deviate from classical expectations. As Max Planck observed, “A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and proclaiming its victories but by its opponents dying out.” This benchmarking approach, focused on identifying non-classical behavior, represents a shift in how quantum computers are assessed, moving toward a more holistic view of their capabilities, much like assessing the health of a complex organism by observing its emergent properties.

Beyond the Quantum Buzz

The pursuit of ‘quantumness’ often fixates on scaling qubit counts, a strategy akin to building a larger engine without first understanding the principles of combustion. This work, by grounding benchmarking in the fundamental tenets of macrorealism, suggests a necessary shift in focus. The ability to robustly violate macrorealistic models – to demonstrably exhibit non-classical behavior – may prove a more meaningful metric than raw qubit numbers, particularly as architectures grow in complexity. The real challenge lies not simply in having many qubits, but in maintaining coherent, verifiable entanglement across them.

Current benchmarking protocols, including the commonly cited Quantum Volume, implicitly assume a degree of classical control and characterization that may not fully capture the subtleties of quantum systems. Mid-circuit parity measurements offer a pathway toward internal, self-verifying diagnostics. However, scaling these measurements without introducing prohibitive overhead remains an open question. The ecosystem of control and measurement must evolve alongside the quantum hardware itself.

Ultimately, the question isn’t simply ‘how quantum’ is a quantum computer, but ‘how reliably quantum’. A system capable of consistently demonstrating violations of macrorealism, even with a modest number of qubits, represents a more solid foundation for future development than a fragile, highly entangled state susceptible to environmental noise. The elegance of a solution is rarely found in its complexity, but in the clarity of its underlying principles.

Original article: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2511.15881.pdf

Contact the author: https://www.linkedin.com/in/avetisyan/

The Evolving Landscape of Quantum Realism

Parity Measurements: A Sensitive Probe of Quantum Systems

Refining Benchmarking Through Disturbance Cancellation

Validating Quantum Foundations and Charting Future Investigations

Beyond the Quantum Buzz

See also: