Is ETH really a security? Ex-Ethereum advisor slams SEC’s move

  • Nerayoff’s allegations against Ethereum add weight to its legal battle with the SEC. 
  • Skepticism over fairness in SEC’s handling of Ethereum and Ripple, emphasizes transparency urgency.

As a researcher with extensive experience in the cryptocurrency industry, I find Nerayoff’s allegations against Ethereum and the SEC to be concerning. The ongoing legal battle between Ethereum and the SEC takes on new significance in light of Lubin’s lawsuit and Nerayoff’s accusations.


As a crypto investor, I’ve been surprised by recent developments surrounding Ethereum [ETH]. The spotlight has shifted back to this cryptocurrency due to questions about its classification as a security.

The heart of the matter revolves around Joseph Lubin’s ConsenSys lawsuit, which intends to keep Ethereum from being labeled as a security. Speaking on X, Joseph Lubin expressed,

“We are suing the SEC and fighting back against its overzealous regulatory overreach.” 

The unexpected twist 

As an analyst, I find it intriguing that Steven Nerayoff, who previously advised Ethereum, has become involved in this situation. His recent comments on X (previously known as Twitter), fueling the curiosity and anticipation surrounding the ongoing legal dispute, are certainly worth noting.

It’s clear that the update being rolled out today is a carefully thought-out strategy orchestrated by Consensys, Ethereum Joseph, and the SEC Government.

He added, 

As an analyst, I’ve observed that their objective is to generate ambiguity in the circumstances and mask their partnership by appearing adversarial towards one another. Nevertheless, their efforts are not clandestine enough, and we can discern their true intentions from their actions.

The intricacy of this issue brings up concerns regarding clarity and honesty in the world of cryptocurrencies.

What’s more to it? 

Further, expressing a firm conviction that Ethereum has functioned as a centralized platform since its initial coin offering (ICO), Nerayoff pointed out,

“This move is to distract people from the truth and just another cover-up.”

Needless to say, he further claimed, 

As a seasoned crypto investor, I’ve come across situations where ICO purchases made with a speculative mindset and undisclosed large holders (whales) raise red flags for potential securities fraud. Ignoring these warning signs is not an option for me.

As a crypto investor, I’ve taken notice of some significant purchases made by Joseph Lubin during the ICO, which has raised suspicions of securities fraud. This concern became even more substantial when SEC Chair Gary Gensler disclosed that Lubin acquired 9.5% of the ICO.

As an analyst, I’d express it this way: I have reservations about the impartiality of the SEC’s role in enforcing justice regarding Ethereum, given the potential for a close relationship between the two parties.

As a researcher investigating potential cases of corruption and collusion in regulatory bodies, the fact that Bill Hinman, a former SEC official, is reportedly considering seeking refuge in a non-extradition country raises serious concerns. This behavior implies a possible involvement in high-level wrongdoing within these organizations.

Further, he highlights notable individuals in Ethereum’s management team, including Joseph Lubin and Vitalik Buterin, alleging they engaged in dishonest activities.

Connection with Ripple 

As a crypto investor, I was taken aback when I learned about the connection between Ethereum’s ongoing legal battles and the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) case against Ripple (XRP). The situation seems complex and intertwined, with Ethereum’s challenges potentially influencing the outcome of the SEC’s action against Ripple.

As an analyst, I’d like to acknowledge the resilience of the XRP community, who have bravely withstood the recent challenges and continue to push back against what they perceive as unwarranted targeting of Ripple by the government.

As a researcher delving into the intricacies of the cryptocurrency world, this discovery poses significant questions regarding the distribution of power. It underscores the essential importance of upholding fairness and promoting transparency within this dynamic ecosystem.

Read More

2024-04-26 21:12