Changpeng Zhao gets 4 months, Sam Bankman-Fried gets 25 years — Why?

As a seasoned crypto investor with a keen interest in the industry’s developments and legal proceedings, I find myself deeply troubled by the vastly different treatment of Sam “SBF” Bankman-Fried and Changpeng “CZ” Zhao in the U.S. justice system. While both individuals have played significant roles in shaping the crypto landscape, their experiences with the law could not be more dissimilar.


In the crypto sphere, two prominent individuals have been sentenced to significantly disparate periods of incarceration in the US.

After the sentencing proceedings for Sam Bankman-Fried, the ex-CEO of FTX, and Changpeng Zhao, the former CEO of Binance, in the US justice system, there have been numerous debates both within and outside the crypto community regarding the disparate treatment these two influential figures have received. By the time Bankman-Fied is released from prison, he may be in his fifties and is expected to possess fewer assets than Zhao, who will regain his freedom by the end of this year and, as per Forbes’ estimation, boasts a net worth of approximately $33 billion.

But let’s back up a minute.

In 2022, Bankman-Fried was taken into custody, subsequently extradited to the US, entered a not guilty plea, was released on house arrest, but was re-imprisoned due to accusations of witness intimidation. He faced a six-week trial and was ultimately convicted, receiving a 25-year prison sentence. In contrast, Zhao was indicted in 2023, entered a guilty plea, remained free on bail, and was sentenced to four months’ imprisonment. He is expected to surrender within a short period.

As an analyst, I would rephrase it this way: Seven felony charges were brought against the former FTX CEO for allegedly defrauding investors and misappropriating customer funds. In contrast, CZ, the chief executive of Binance, is facing a single charge related to insufficient implementation of an Anti-Money Laundering program.

“CZ was accused of not having sufficient Anti-Money Laundering safeguards in place, which is considered a regulatory offense, whereas SBF was indicted for wire fraud involving the clandestine transfer of billions of dollars from FTX’s crypto holdings to Alameda. Although both offenses are significant, SBF’s crime carried greater severity.”

Changpeng Zhao gets 4 months, Sam Bankman-Fried gets 25 years — Why?

Since the emergence of his legal issues, Bankman-Fried and his legal team have predominantly argued that he acted based on what he believed to be right. During the sentencing hearing, Judge Lewis Kaplan reproached the ex-FTX CEO for allegedly lying under oath and deemed his testimony as elusive. In his initial interview post-sentence, Bankman-Fried stated: “I never considered that my actions were breaking the law.”

As a researcher examining the evidence presented in the trial, I’ve come across some compelling facts that call into question SBF’s defense. Several government witnesses, including his former romantic partner and Alameda Research CEO Caroline Ellison, have testified that they believe I orchestrated the misuse of FTX user funds.

I, as an analyst, observed a notable contrast in Zhao’s actions following the high-profile case between U.S. authorities and Binance in late 2023. After reaching a $4.3 billion settlement and pleading guilty in November of that year, Zhao chose to remain silent publicly regarding the matter. Instead, he submitted extensive letters from industry leaders, family members, and others to the court.

“Terrence Yang, Swan Bitcoin’s managing director, explained to CryptoMoon that despite my belief in CZ’s involvement in more serious offenses, the DOJ lacked sufficient evidence. In contrast to SBF, CZ didn’t resist extradition and agreed to a plea deal for lighter crimes, which only requires him to pay $50M to the DOJ.”

Changpeng Zhao gets 4 months, Sam Bankman-Fried gets 25 years — Why?

As a crypto investor following the recent developments, I have my doubts about Changpeng Zhao (CZ) and Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) sharing a cell while incarcerated. It’s unlikely they’ll be housed in the same facility given their high-profile cases. Although the judge in SBF’s case suggested he might serve time in a San Francisco Bay Area prison, there’s still a chance he could remain in New York during his appeal process. Contrarily, CZ is expected to spend four months at the Federal Detention Center SeaTac in Washington, with a reporting date yet to be determined.

Read More

2024-05-01 20:43