Crypto’s Quiet Revolution: The Iceberg Beneath the Surface

by

CoinDesk Indices

What to know:

Ah, you’ve stumbled upon Crypto for Advisors, CoinDesk’s weekly newsletter-a beacon of wisdom in the digital wilderness. Subscribe, dear reader, and let it grace your inbox every Thursday like a punctual yet uninvited guest.

In this week’s installment, Andy Baehr from GSR muses on the crypto market’s lethargy, while advisors, like industrious ants, quietly construct portfolios that dare to venture beyond Bitcoin. Oh, the audacity!

And in our “Ask an Expert” section, Patrick Velleman of Valdora offers sage advice on navigating this brave new world of durable crypto allocations. How quaint.

– Sarah Morton

Summer Approaches. Fortify Your Core.

The crypto markets, like a languid summer afternoon, exude an air of indifference. Yet, beneath this veneer of apathy, investors stir, seeking a long-term haven in the digital realm. ’Tis the season to prepare for the next tempest.

The inevitable query arises, as it must, from friend, relative, or client: ”I wish to dabble in crypto. What, pray tell, should I acquire?”

Before we indulge this curiosity, let us confront the present state of affairs with unflinching honesty.

Rallies Without Vigor

The silver lining: crypto prices ascend. The less gleaming truth: they ascend with all the enthusiasm of a snail on a leisurely stroll. Bitcoin, once in the mid-$60,000s, now graces the high $70,000s. Ether (ETH) crawls from $1,800 to $2,300, and Solana (SOL) lingers in the mid-$80s. Progress, yes, but devoid of fervor. A rally without a pulse, a symphony without a crescendo-and more than a few sad-trombone moments that fizzle before they can flourish.

This ambivalence, so palpable, compelled us to devise a Conviction/Ambivalence gauge. In Q1 2026, we reached the zenith of ambivalence. Other indicators concur. Funding rates on perpetual futures, a barometer of leveraged zeal, remain stubbornly low or negative. DeFi borrow rates on Aave drifted toward 3% before a recent exploit, a far cry from the 20%+ post-2024 election frenzy or the 5-7% of more typical times. The fast money has fled to oil, equities, prediction markets. Volatility, both magnet and offspring of heated markets, is scarce in crypto at present.

A stark contrast to last year’s Q2 and Q3 rally, which surged with velocity, power, and breadth. ETH led the charge. SOL pushed valiantly in August and September. The GENIUS Act added fuel to the fire. That was a market with conviction, a market alive.

The Subtle Shift of Greater Import

And yet, beneath the surface, a more enduring transformation unfolds: long-term investors and their advisors, with quiet resolve, grow comfortable allocating to crypto. This shift does not ignite X with the fervor of a funding rate spike. No charts trumpet advisors’ quiet portfolio construction, yet it is the iceberg that truly matters. In time, its effects will be felt, and they will endure.

For these allocators, BTC alone no longer suffices. Its role is clear: the macro asset, perhaps even a defensive haven when markets contract. But advisors are pressed to venture further. Clients crave exposure to the blockchain growth narrative: tokenization, stablecoins, the layer-one infrastructure now dominating business headlines.

What, Then, Should Constitute the Core?

Our answer is straightforward: BTC, ETH, and SOL. The triumvirate. The survivors of cycles past. Two distinct themes across three assets: BTC as the macro cornerstone, with ETH and SOL as the layer-ones upon which blockchain’s growth story unfolds. Neck and neck, genuine rivals, yet both poised to triumph.

A robust core, however, should not merely exist. Proof-of-stake assets like ETH and SOL can generate yield through staking, a return stream often neglected by passive holders. And one desires a product that adapts to the market: one that discerns different environments and adjusts weights to pursue excess return, rather than maintaining fixed allocations through every regime.

A tall order, indeed. Thus, we launched an ETF to simplify matters.

The GSR Crypto Core3 ETF (BESO) encapsulates the core-BTC, ETH, and SOL-with staking rewards on ETH and SOL, and active, research-driven weekly rebalancing. Over time, investors will seek satellite holdings-sectors, themes, and factors. But Core3 is designed to excel at its primary task: core crypto market beta, with staking and active management built in.

gsretps.io/etf/beso

– Andy Baehr, managing director, Asset Management at GSR *

Ask an Expert

Q. How does digital asset investing and trading differ from traditional assets?

The most profound difference lies in the blockchain’s transparency. Holdings, transactions, strategies-even a protocol’s behavior over time-are all visible. Anyone with a wallet address and a block explorer can scrutinize your every move. A level of transparency traditional markets can only dream of. This alters the informational landscape in which clients operate.

The second divergence is the 24/7 price discovery, which ensures volatility never rests. Then there is self-custody. In traditional finance, custody is another’s burden, often insured. In digital assets, it is yours, whether you like it or not. Empowering, as you truly own the asset, yet perilous, as the responsibility for keys, backups, and operational security falls squarely on your shoulders. A lost phrase is a permanent loss, a reason why figures like CZ (Changpeng Zhao, former CEO of Binance) advocate for centralized exchanges.

For advisors, this means the client conversation extends beyond allocation to encompass custody setup, key management, and operational risk-a novel dimension.

Q. How do vaults and onchain finance alter the investing vs trading debate?

The question is no longer invest versus trade, but rather, which yields are genuine and which are not. After cycles of degen farming, triple-digit APYs, and collapsing protocols, serious participants have shifted from “how much can I earn” to “how durable is this.”

Hence the rise of vaults. A well-designed vault allows capital to remain in the market with minimal manual intervention. Deposit into a strategy, and let it run-less movement, less clicking, less emotional decision-making. For those averse to trading, this is a marked improvement over previous on-chain options, which were largely passive holding or active yield farming.

Liquidity is another critical aspect. Many traditional yield products lock up capital. Private credit funds, for instance, have redemption windows ranging from a week to a quarter. A vault issuing a liquid token against your deposit offers something different. Your capital earns, yet remains movable if needed. A genuine shift in structuring long-term allocations.

The path ahead promises yields perhaps less thrilling than crypto’s historical offerings, but more sustainable. And at least boredom won’t leave you REKT.

Q. As automated vaults handle technical ‘trading’ (rebalancing, compounding, liquidating), does an advisor’s value-add shift from ‘picking winners’ to ‘curating risk profiles’?

Indeed, and a valuable shift it is.

When strategy mechanics are managed by a smart contract, execution is no longer the advisor’s domain. Rebalancing, compounding, liquidation-all automated. Yet judgment remains essential. Someone must evaluate what the market offers, vet it, and decide where to allocate client capital. Due diligence: Who built this vault? What is the underlying strategy? What are the custody arrangements? How has it performed under stress? Is the team credible? The audit? What if a dependency fails?

Then, align the client’s risk appetite with the actual risks of available vaults. A conservative client might prefer a tokenized Treasury vault or a stablecoin yield vault. A bolder client might accept a DeFi yield vault or an FX strategy vault. Curating risk is where the human touch remains indispensable.

– Patrick Velleman, chief marketing officer, Valdora CMO

* Risk Disclosure

illiquidity, reliance on third-party providers, slashing, missed rewards, validator issues, and errors. Staking rewards are earned by the Trust, not directly by investors. ‍Liquidity Risk. Unbonding periods for staked Reference Assets can range from days to weeks, depending on network whims.
Concentration Risk. The Fund’s assets are concentrated in sectors or industries tied to the Reference Assets, exposing it to greater risk should those sectors falter.
Foreign Securities Risk. To the extent the Fund invests in foreign securities, it may face additional risks not typical of domestic investments.‍Indirect Investment Risk. The Reference ETFs and Reference Assets are unaffiliated with the Trust, the Adviser, or their affiliates, and bear no responsibility for this offering.‍New Fund Risk. The Fund is a nascent entity with no operating history, leaving prospective investors without a track record to guide their decisions.‍Non-Diversification Risk. As a non-diversified fund, it may invest a larger portion of its assets in a single issuer or fewer issuers than a diversified fund.

Read More

2026-05-07 18:13