Decoding Dynamics: Smarter Data for Accurate Models

Author: Denis Avetisyan

New research demonstrates how information theory can dramatically improve the efficiency of identifying underlying systems from observational data.

The research demonstrates that transitioning from a randomly initialized trajectory to one carrying more information results in a quantifiable reduction in both $L_2$-coefficient loss and prediction loss, suggesting improved model accuracy and efficiency with informed data pathways.

Leveraging the Fisher Information Matrix and entropy-based optimization enhances sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics, leading to more effective data-driven modeling.

Identifying underlying dynamical systems from observational data remains a challenge, often requiring substantial datasets for accurate model discovery. This paper, ‘Information theory and discriminative sampling for model discovery’, introduces a framework leveraging Fisher information and Shannon entropy to enhance data efficiency within the sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics (SINDy) approach. By prioritizing informative data through information-based sampling, we demonstrate significant improvements in model performance and reduced data requirements across diverse scenarios. Could these principles pave the way for more effective and scalable data-driven modeling techniques in complex systems?

The Illusion of Infinite Exploration

Scientific advancement frequently hinges on the ability to pinpoint the best model from a nearly infinite number of possibilities, a process demanding exploration of extensive parameter spaces. These spaces, defined by the various inputs and settings of a system, quickly become computationally overwhelming as the number of parameters increases. Consider, for instance, climate modeling, where variables like greenhouse gas concentrations, solar radiation, and ocean currents interact in complex ways; finding the model that accurately predicts future climate necessitates navigating a multi-dimensional landscape of potential combinations. Similarly, in fields like drug discovery and materials science, researchers must sift through countless molecular configurations or material compositions to identify those with desired properties. This challenge isn’t merely about computational power, but also about designing efficient strategies to intelligently sample this vastness, avoiding random searches that are often impractical and time-consuming.

Established experimental design methodologies, lauded for their statistical rigor, often encounter limitations when applied to increasingly complex systems. The computational burden of these techniques-which typically involves evaluating a model’s behavior across a vast parameter space-grows exponentially with each added variable or degree of freedom. Consequently, what might be a feasible investigation for a simplified system quickly becomes intractable, demanding prohibitive amounts of processing time and resources. This scalability issue presents a significant obstacle to scientific advancement, particularly in fields like materials science, drug discovery, and climate modeling, where accurate model calibration requires exploring high-dimensional landscapes and quantifying uncertainty across numerous interacting factors.

The pursuit of accurate models-those capable of reliably predicting real-world phenomena-is fundamentally hampered by the computational cost of thorough investigation. Fields like climate science, drug discovery, and materials design rely on precise calibration of complex models against observational data, a process requiring extensive exploration of numerous parameter combinations. When traditional methods struggle to efficiently navigate these high-dimensional spaces, the resulting uncertainty in model predictions can significantly limit the utility of the research. This inability to confidently quantify model behavior not only slows scientific advancement but also introduces risks in applications where decisions are based on these imperfect representations of reality, ultimately underscoring the critical need for more scalable and efficient exploration techniques.

Probabilistic Wandering: A Pragmatic Approach

Bayesian Optimization is a sequential design strategy employed for function optimization, particularly effective when evaluating the objective function is costly or time-consuming. Unlike gradient-based methods, it does not require derivative information and is well-suited for non-convex, noisy, or black-box functions. The process iteratively builds a probabilistic model of the objective function, using this model to select the next point to evaluate. This sequential approach allows the algorithm to efficiently converge on optimal solutions by focusing evaluations on promising regions of the search space, minimizing the total number of function evaluations required to find a near-optimal solution. This is achieved through the use of an acquisition function that balances exploration of uncertain areas with exploitation of areas predicted to yield high values.

Bayesian Optimization employs probabilistic models, typically Gaussian Processes (GPs), to represent the unknown objective function $f(x)$. These models provide not only a prediction of the function’s value at a given input $x$, denoted as $\hat{f}(x)$, but also a measure of the uncertainty associated with that prediction, often expressed as the standard deviation $\sigma(x)$. The GP outputs a probability distribution over possible functions, allowing the algorithm to quantify the confidence in its predictions. This uncertainty quantification is crucial; higher uncertainty indicates regions of the input space where further exploration may yield significant improvements, while lower uncertainty suggests regions where exploitation – refining the solution near current best estimates – is more appropriate. The predictive mean and variance are updated iteratively as new function evaluations are obtained, refining the model and guiding the optimization process.

Bayesian Optimization improves efficiency by strategically balancing exploration and exploitation during optimization. Traditional methods, such as grid search or random search, often require a large number of function evaluations to locate the optimum. In contrast, Bayesian Optimization utilizes a probabilistic surrogate model – typically a Gaussian Process – to approximate the objective function. This model provides both a prediction of function values and an associated uncertainty estimate. Exploitation focuses evaluations on regions predicted to have high values, while exploration directs evaluations to areas where uncertainty is high. The algorithm quantifies this trade-off using an acquisition function, which guides the selection of the next evaluation point. This targeted approach minimizes the number of required function evaluations, often achieving better results with significantly fewer iterations than methods that lack this adaptive sampling strategy. The reduction in evaluations is particularly beneficial when each function evaluation is computationally expensive or time-consuming.

The Entropy Illusion: Quantifying What We Don’t Know

Entropy-based metrics quantify uncertainty by assessing the probability distribution of potential outcomes. Specifically, Shannon entropy, denoted as $H(X) = – \sum_{i} p(x_i) \log p(x_i)$, calculates the expected value of the information contained in a random variable. Higher entropy values indicate greater uncertainty or randomness in the data, as the probability is more evenly distributed across possible states. Conversely, low entropy signifies a more predictable system with concentrated probability. These metrics are applicable to both discrete and continuous data, utilizing probability mass functions and probability density functions respectively, and provide a standardized, information-theoretic approach to evaluating data predictability and information content.

Bayesian Optimization (BO) relies on probabilistic surrogates to model unknown objective functions; entropy-based metrics serve as crucial components in the acquisition function which governs the selection of the next data point to evaluate. The acquisition function balances exploration-searching regions of high uncertainty-and exploitation-refining estimates in promising regions. Metrics like predictive entropy quantify the expected reduction in uncertainty about the surrogate model given a new data point. Maximizing this entropy, or related measures, directs the search towards areas where evaluating the objective function will yield the most information, thereby improving the efficiency of the optimization process and reducing the number of function evaluations needed to converge on an optimum. This is in contrast to methods relying solely on expected improvement, which can become trapped in local optima.

Predictive Entropy Search (PES) is an experimental design strategy that leverages the predictive entropy of a surrogate model to determine the most informative data points for evaluation. In reaction-diffusion systems, PES has demonstrated a significant reduction in the number of required measurements compared to traditional methods. Specifically, PES achieves comparable or improved performance with fewer than 25% of the experiments needed by uniformly random sampling or other common Bayesian Optimization approaches. This efficiency stems from PES’s ability to prioritize experiments that maximize the reduction in model uncertainty, as quantified by the predictive entropy $H(y|x)$, thereby accelerating the convergence of the surrogate model and minimizing the overall experimental cost.

Gaussian Processes: Smoothing Over the Cracks

Gaussian Processes (GPs) define a probability distribution over functions, allowing for the modeling of complex relationships without specifying a parametric form. A GP is fully defined by its mean function $m(x)$ and covariance function $k(x, x’)$, where $k(x, x’)$ determines the similarity between function values at inputs $x$ and $x’$. The key feature of GPs is their ability to provide not only a prediction for a function’s value at a given input but also a measure of uncertainty associated with that prediction, expressed as a variance. This uncertainty quantification stems from the probabilistic nature of the model; predictions are not single values but rather probability distributions. The covariance function allows the model to express prior beliefs about the function’s smoothness and expected behavior, and Bayesian inference updates these beliefs based on observed data, resulting in a posterior distribution over functions that captures both the model’s knowledge and the uncertainty remaining after observing the data.

Gaussian Processes (GPs) facilitate Bayesian Optimization by providing a closed-form expression for the posterior distribution over functions, a significant advantage over methods requiring iterative approximation. This analytical tractability stems from the GP’s definition of any finite set of function values as a multivariate Gaussian distribution. Given observed data, the posterior distribution-representing the updated belief about the function-is also Gaussian. This allows direct calculation of predictive means and variances without resorting to computationally expensive sampling methods like Markov Chain Monte Carlo. Specifically, if $f$ is a GP and we observe data $D = {(x_i, y_i)}$, the posterior mean $\mu(x)$ and variance $\sigma^2(x)$ at a new input $x$ can be computed directly using the kernel function and the observed data, enabling efficient acquisition function optimization and surrogate model updates.

The integration of Gaussian Processes (GPs) with entropy-based acquisition functions facilitates efficient optimization by balancing exploration and exploitation during the search for optimal solutions. Entropy-based acquisition functions, such as Probability of Improvement (PI) or Expected Improvement (EI), guide the selection of parameters to evaluate, prioritizing regions of high uncertainty as quantified by the GP’s predictive variance. This strategy results in an accelerated convergence rate, particularly when optimizing control parameters using information-theoretic objectives. Empirical results demonstrate a significant reduction in coefficient loss compared to methods lacking this informed exploration capability, as the GP-driven acquisition function effectively directs sampling towards areas most likely to yield improved performance with minimal evaluations.

The pursuit of elegant models, as detailed in this work on sparse identification and Fisher Information Matrices, invariably courts a certain fragility. It’s a familiar pattern; optimization, in its zeal to pinpoint underlying dynamics, often forgets that production systems are fundamentally messy. Donald Davies observed, “Everything optimized will one day be optimized back.” This rings particularly true here. The paper’s focus on data efficiency-reducing the need for exhaustive datasets-isn’t about achieving perfection, but about building systems resilient enough to withstand the inevitable compromises required by real-world deployment. It’s not about discovering the model, but about finding one that survives contact with data’s inherent noise and incompleteness.

The Road Ahead

The pursuit of parsimonious models from observational data, as explored here, will inevitably encounter the usual suspects. Increased complexity in datasets – more variables, greater noise, and the persistent problem of limited data – will test the limits of even information-theoretic approaches. The Fisher Information Matrix, while elegant in theory, becomes a computational burden when applied to truly high-dimensional systems. One suspects that the next generation of algorithms will focus less on finding the ‘true’ model and more on efficiently navigating the space of ‘good enough’ models for a given task.

The promise of active learning, guided by entropy-based optimization, is compelling, but the practical realities of production systems are rarely so cooperative. Real-world data rarely arrives in neat batches, and the cost of experimentation is often far higher than assumed in academic settings. It’s a safe bet that future work will need to address the challenge of continual learning – adapting models to evolving dynamics without catastrophic forgetting – and grapple with the messy problem of deploying these techniques in environments where data quality is, at best, variable.

Ultimately, this line of inquiry will likely yield not a single, definitive solution, but a collection of tools and techniques – each with its own strengths and weaknesses. The legacy of this work will not be a perfect model discovery algorithm, but a deeper understanding of the fundamental trade-offs between data efficiency, model accuracy, and computational cost. It’s a comforting thought, really – a reminder that even the most sophisticated methods are, in the end, just temporary reprieves from the inevitable entropy of a complex world.

Original article: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2512.16000.pdf

Contact the author: https://www.linkedin.com/in/avetisyan/

The Illusion of Infinite Exploration

Probabilistic Wandering: A Pragmatic Approach

The Entropy Illusion: Quantifying What We Don’t Know

Gaussian Processes: Smoothing Over the Cracks

The Road Ahead

See also: