DeFi’s 2026: Because Hacking Is In

by

Makina, a DeFi protocol that’s clearly auditioning for “Shark Tank: Blockchain Edition,” got hacked on 20 January, resulting in the loss of over $4 million. 

DeFi’s 2026 has been a party where the only invite is “How to Lose Millions in Style.” Makina’s exploit adds to this year’s growing list of security fails, proving that old attack vectors are still the MVPs of the hacking world.

Makina exploit: what happened

On 20 January, Makina’s DUSD/USDC Curve pool became the victim of a $4.2 million heist. Turns out, liquidity providers are just glorified safecrackers now. The team claimed the attack was “isolated” to USDC-because nothing says “trust” like a liquidity provider who’s more interested in stealing your cash than providing liquidity.

The team was alerted in the early hours of the incident and immediately thought, “Oh, just a regular Tuesday. Let’s hit up SEAL911 and our auditors for a group hug.” The protocol’s Security Council activated recovery mode, pausing all Machines. Classic move-just pause the chaos and pretend you’re fixing it. Meanwhile, Hypernative alerts were like, “Hey, this looks suspicious,” one block before the exploit. Because of course, an MEV bot was there to steal the spotlight.

Makina said they’ve identified the root cause and are taking steps to prevent further losses. Spoiler: It’s probably not “stop being a financial black hole.” They’re also pursuing recovery efforts, which means sending stern emails to hackers while sipping lukewarm coffee.

Liquidity providers were advised to “withdraw single-sided to DUSD” while recovery continues. Because nothing says “user-friendly” like making people scramble like it’s Black Friday at the bank.

A full post-mortem is expected once investigations are complete. Translation: We’ll write a report so vague it could be used as a napkin.

January 2026: a familiar pattern of DeFi exploits

Makina’s incident is just the latest in a string of DeFi disasters this year. January 2026 has been like a bad rom-com where the same plot holes keep winning awards. Most losses aren’t from fancy new hacks-they’re from logic errors, configuration risks, and legacy contracts that clearly haven’t updated their dating profiles.

Among the big-name flops in January:

  • Truebit [8 January]: Lost $26 million thanks to a flaw tied to legacy bytecode and bonding-curve mechanics. Because who needs proper code when you can have legacy bytecode and a bad day?
  • YO Protocol [13-14 January]: Drained $3.7 million in what was described as a slippage-related exploit or operator-level misconfiguration. Sounds like someone spilled coffee on their keyboard.
  • TMXTribe [early January]: Lost $1.4 million due to a logic bug. Because math is hard, and some people just can’t count.

Smaller incidents? Oh, those were just warm-ups. Many involved user-side wallet compromises-because nothing says “trust” like leaving your keys in a public place.

Losses concentrated in a handful of incidents

While more than half a dozen security events have been reported since the start of the year, total losses remain heavily concentrated in a small number of exploits. Truebit alone accounts for most of the drama, with Makina and YO Protocol playing the sidekicks in this financial tragedy.

This concentration suggests that, while exploit frequency remains elevated, systemic risk is still driven by a few high-impact failures. It’s like the DeFi version of “The Few Who Can’t: A Tale of Massive Losses.”

Final Thoughts

  • Early 2026 exploits show that familiar DeFi failure modes are persisting, with losses driven by scale rather than new attack techniques. Because nothing says “innovation” like repeating the same mistakes.
  • Makina’s incident underscores the importance of MEV-aware design and rapid-response frameworks as protocol complexity increases. Or, you know, just don’t let hackers have all the fun.

Read More

2026-01-21 20:07