House 1985 Review: A Forgotten Horror Gem That Still Deserves Cult Classic Status

by

Originally released in theaters on December 6, 1985, by New World Pictures, House was directed by Steve Miner, known for his work on the Friday the 13th series. The story came from Fred Dekker, the creator of comedy-horror favorites like Night of the Creeps and Monster Squad. Starring William Katt, Richard Moll, George Wendt, and Kay Lenz, House offered a unique blend of dark humor and emotional release. Despite a modest start, the film, made on a $3 million budget, quickly gained a following and has become a beloved cult classic, even spawning two sequels. Today, it’s considered a key film in the horror genre, praised for its playful tone, impressive practical effects, and strong performances.

I’ve always been drawn to stories with a good, haunting core, and this one definitely delivers. It centers around Arthur Cobb, a celebrated author who’s really struggling with things – a tough past in Vietnam and, more recently, the disappearance of his son, Jimmy. Jimmy vanished while staying with Arthur’s Aunt Elizabeth, a woman who insisted her old Victorian house was haunted. The whole situation understandably wrecked Arthur’s marriage. Then, things get even stranger when Aunt Elizabeth unexpectedly dies, leaving the house to Arthur. As he tries to write his memoir and deal with a well-meaning but nosy neighbor, Arthur starts to believe his aunt might have been right about the house being haunted. He begins to suspect the answers to Jimmy’s disappearance, and the terrifying things happening within those walls, are connected to his family history in ways he never imagined. It’s a really compelling setup, and honestly, it’s held up remarkably well over the years, even with a few minor flaws.

House’s Foundation Is Both Horror and Humor

The 1980s are widely remembered as the peak of horror filmmaking. This decade saw the rise of slasher films, fresh takes on classic monsters, and a resurgence of creature features. Filmmakers skillfully updated familiar horror themes and techniques for a modern audience. New technologies like improved special effects, editing tools, and the steadicam gave aspiring directors the means to realize their creative visions. Steve Miner was one such director, and he got his start with the Friday the 13th franchise, directing the second and third films in 1981 and 1982. These movies are particularly famous for introducing Jason Voorhees as the main villain.

Given his success with a well-known franchise, it made sense for Miner to direct an original film. He brought the same skill for adding depth to characters – the same skill that made Jason Voorhees both terrifying and relatable – to this new project. This worked particularly well with Fred Dekker’s darkly comedic script, allowing Miner to handle the difficult backstory and emotional journey of a troubled veteran with sensitivity, while still maintaining the film’s humor. This gentle approach was crucial for portraying the often-funny, yet deeply disturbing, Vietnam War flashbacks (featuring strong performances from Katt and Richard Moll), as well as the lasting pain caused by the death of Aunt Elizabeth and the mysterious disappearance of Arthur’s son.

House’s Humor Holds Up, As Do Its Practical Effects

As a fan, I’d say House is a genuinely scary horror movie, but what really sets it apart is how clever it is. It doesn’t take itself too seriously and manages to weave in humor and even a little bit of drama really well. The script by Ethan Wiley, combined with Miner’s direction, creates a unique tone. The actors deliver their lines in such a dry, matter-of-fact way, which adds to the effect. And of course, it’s based on a great story! Katt and Wendt are fantastic; Katt brings a really subtle, sarcastic charm to his character, Arthur Cobb, who’s understandably on edge, while Wendt plays Harold as this lovable, clumsy busybody. Harold is awkward, but in a way that’s endearing – he’s funny without being irritating, which is a perfect balance.

Compared to other horror films from the 1980s, House really showcases the impressive practical effects of the era. It feels genuinely real and textured in every scene, even when things get fantastical. A lot of care went into the set design and special effects, and it’s clear on screen. The house itself—a Victorian manor in California owned by two firefighters—was actually painted and renovated for the film, creating a unique atmosphere that’s both inviting and unsettling. Beyond the house, the film features fantastic practical creatures, puppets, and makeup. While some of the horror elements don’t quite hit the mark, the production design is masterful, and the film has a uniquely appealing, gritty feel, from the disturbing parody of Kay Lenz to the gruesome monsters and zombie makeup on Richard Moll.

A Promising Premise Is Robbed Of Its Potential As Plot Threads Are Left Hanging

House is a genuinely exciting and memorable film that has rightfully gained a dedicated following. It succeeds thanks to its intriguing story, effective blend of scares and comedy, and a relatable, flawed hero. While still enjoyable after 40 years, the movie isn’t perfect. The haunted house itself is well-established and its eerie atmosphere is balanced with humor. However, the film doesn’t fully explain the house’s origins or true power, making the ending, though somewhat satisfying, feel rushed and a little disappointing.

The movie doesn’t really explain why the house is haunted or how it connects to Arthur’s past, offering only the vague idea that perception shapes reality. While this explains Arthur’s experience, it doesn’t quite fit the story of his Aunt Elizabeth. The film relies on war flashbacks and comedic horror to keep viewers from focusing on these plot issues. Some of the scares aren’t very effective, and the movie prioritizes humor over horror for most of its runtime, only becoming truly tense in the final moments. Additionally, Arthur’s relationship with his ex-wife, Sandy, feels underdeveloped, missing an opportunity for a more complex and interesting dynamic beyond their shared grief and divorce.

The story’s timing feels uneven. While it starts strong, the first part is slow to get going, relying on clever humor and intentionally awkward scenes. Once the spooky events begin, the movie finds a better rhythm. However, some jokes and side stories interrupt the suspense and slow down the main plot. These comedic elements, though funny, aren’t as effective as the film’s subtle wit or its genuinely frightening moments, which build to a strong and suspenseful ending.

While not flawless, House remains a thoroughly enjoyable film. It has some issues with pacing and doesn’t always maximize its scares, but these shortcomings are easy to overlook. What truly shines is its clever, self-deprecating humor, the actors’ dry delivery, impressive practical effects, strong production design, and charming characters. Even after 40 years, House holds up as a beloved and quirky cult classic, offering a fresh and sometimes unsettling take on classic horror tropes.

Read More

2025-10-27 13:37