Simulating Magnetic Order with Quantum Processors

by

Author: Denis Avetisyan

Researchers have successfully used programmable quantum annealers to model antiferromagnetic hysteresis, opening new avenues for exploring complex magnetic phenomena.

Magnetic hysteresis was observed in two-dimensional antiferromagnetic square lattices across four D-Wave quantum annealers, with the average magnetization-displayed as a function of the applied longitudinal field-demonstrating the time-progression of analog simulations and the sweep direction of the field itself through overlaid arrows.
Magnetic hysteresis was observed in two-dimensional antiferromagnetic square lattices across four D-Wave quantum annealers, with the average magnetization-displayed as a function of the applied longitudinal field-demonstrating the time-progression of analog simulations and the sweep direction of the field itself through overlaid arrows.

This work demonstrates the simulation of antiferromagnetic hysteresis and observation of key magnetic properties like spin structure factor and NĂ©el order parameter using quantum annealing.

While antiferromagnets lack a net magnetization, their complex internal ordering can exhibit surprising memory effects, challenging classical descriptions of magnetic behavior. In ‘Probing Antiferromagnetic Hysteresis on Programmable Quantum Annealers’, we leverage programmable quantum annealing processors to implement a sampling-based protocol for observing magnetic hysteresis in these materials. Our results demonstrate full hysteresis loop saturation and reversal, revealing emergent magnetic domain structures mediated by quantum fluctuations-evidence of a robust magnetic memory effect. Could this analog quantum simulation approach unlock new insights into complex magnetic phenomena and guide the design of novel antiferromagnetic devices?

The Imperative of Novel Computational Substrates

Conventional computational architectures, while remarkably successful, encounter fundamental limitations when tackling complex optimization problems. These challenges stem from the exponential increase in computational resources required as problem size grows – a phenomenon that quickly renders brute-force approaches impractical. Many real-world scenarios, such as logistical planning, materials discovery, and financial modeling, present such complexities, demanding algorithms capable of efficiently navigating vast solution spaces. The inherent constraints of traditional von Neumann architectures, including sequential processing and the physical limitations of miniaturization, further exacerbate these difficulties. Consequently, researchers are actively exploring alternative paradigms-including those inspired by the principles of physics-to overcome these bottlenecks and unlock the potential for solving previously intractable problems, paving the way for advancements in artificial intelligence and scientific discovery.

Antiferromagnetic materials present a compelling alternative to conventional computational substrates due to their unique spin configurations. Unlike ferromagnets where spins align in the same direction, antiferromagnets exhibit neighboring spins aligning in opposing directions, resulting in zero net magnetization. This seemingly counterintuitive property offers significant advantages; it shields the system from external magnetic interference, enhancing stability and reducing energy dissipation. Furthermore, information isn’t stored in individual magnetic moments, but rather in the collective, correlated state of these opposing spins, opening doors to novel computing architectures. Researchers are actively exploring how to manipulate these spin arrangements – through electric fields, strain, or other stimuli – to create devices that perform computations based on the dynamics of these collective excitations, potentially surpassing the limitations of traditional silicon-based technology and paving the way for more energy-efficient and robust computing systems.

Conventional computing relies on bits representing 0 or 1, but a burgeoning field investigates computation through the collective dynamics of interacting spins in antiferromagnetic materials. Rather than encoding information in single, discrete bits, this approach harnesses the correlated behavior of numerous spins, which align in opposing directions. The resulting system exhibits complex, emergent properties where information is distributed across the material, potentially enabling parallel processing far exceeding the capabilities of traditional architectures. This paradigm shift offers a pathway to tackle optimization problems currently intractable for even the most powerful supercomputers, promising breakthroughs in areas like materials science, machine learning, and cryptography by exploiting the inherent physical properties of these spin systems.

Measurements from a quantum processing unit reveal the emergence of checkerboard antiferromagnetic order within a 33x33 lattice, with domain boundaries clearly visible in both the spin configurations and the corresponding staggered domain height function.
Measurements from a quantum processing unit reveal the emergence of checkerboard antiferromagnetic order within a 33×33 lattice, with domain boundaries clearly visible in both the spin configurations and the corresponding staggered domain height function.

Hardware Realization: Defining Antiferromagnetism Through Quantum Systems

Antiferromagnetic models were directly implemented utilizing the physical connectivity of D-Wave quantum annealers, resulting in the creation of what are termed ‘hardware-defined’ antiferromagnets. This approach leverages the inherent qubit connectivity of the D-Wave architecture to represent the interactions between spins in the antiferromagnetic material. Specifically, the couplers between superconducting flux qubits are programmed to enact the exchange interactions – favoring anti-aligned spin states – characteristic of antiferromagnets. By exploiting the fixed connectivity graph of the quantum annealer, we bypass the need for complex qubit routing or virtual spin representations, allowing for a direct physical realization of the antiferromagnetic Hamiltonian and enabling the study of its properties.

Superconducting flux qubits serve as the fundamental units for representing and controlling spin states within these hardware-defined antiferromagnets. Each qubit’s two energy levels, $|0\rangle$ and $|1\rangle$, directly correspond to the spin-up and spin-down states of a magnetic moment, respectively. Manipulation of these qubit states is achieved through precisely controlled magnetic fields generated by external circuitry, allowing for the implementation of quantum operations that mimic the interactions between spins in a material. This control enables the investigation of complex magnetic phenomena, such as spin correlations, magnetic ordering, and the dynamics of collective excitations, by effectively simulating the behavior of antiferromagnetic systems at the quantum level.

The architecture of D-Wave quantum annealers allows for the direct implementation of antiferromagnetic models through careful mapping of qubit connectivity to spin interactions. Specifically, the physical connections between superconducting flux qubits are leveraged to represent pairwise interactions – both ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic – within the desired configuration. By selectively enabling or disabling these connections, and by adjusting the coupling strengths between qubits, researchers can instantiate and investigate a wide range of antiferromagnetic lattices and geometries, including but not limited to linear chains, square lattices, and more complex arrangements. This hardware-defined approach bypasses the limitations of simulating these systems classically and enables the exploration of magnetic behavior as a function of lattice structure and coupling parameters.

Measurements of a 32x32 antiferromagnetic lattice on a quantum processing unit reveal the emergence of checkerboard spin patterns and boundary effects during magnetization reversal, as visualized by spin configurations (top) and confirmed by the staggered domain height function (bottom).
Measurements of a 32×32 antiferromagnetic lattice on a quantum processing unit reveal the emergence of checkerboard spin patterns and boundary effects during magnetization reversal, as visualized by spin configurations (top) and confirmed by the staggered domain height function (bottom).

Precision Through Calibration: Minimizing Systematic Errors

Flux bias offset balancing is a calibration technique utilized to minimize systematic errors in quantum annealing systems. This process involves applying and subsequently nullifying a known magnetic flux bias to each qubit, effectively counteracting the influence of local field variations and imperfections in the qubit control circuitry. By reducing these offsets, the technique diminishes spurious energy levels and improves the fidelity of quantum state manipulation, leading to a demonstrable reduction in noise and increased stability throughout the annealing process. The consistent application of this calibration method is critical for achieving repeatable results and reliable performance metrics in quantum annealing experiments.

Flux bias offset balancing minimizes the impact of external electromagnetic interference and thermal fluctuations on qubit states. These environmental disturbances can introduce errors in the representation of spin states, leading to inaccuracies in quantum computations. By applying a carefully calibrated flux offset, the system effectively nullifies these unwanted signals, maintaining the integrity of the quantum information encoded in each qubit. This ensures that the measured qubit states accurately reflect the programmed quantum algorithm, improving the reliability and precision of the quantum annealing process and reducing systematic errors in experimental results.

Precise calibration of the quantum annealing system is fundamentally linked to accurate characterization of the antiferromagnetic material’s magnetic properties. Variance in magnetization measurements directly correlates to uncertainty in determining these properties; therefore, meticulous calibration procedures are necessary to minimize this variance. Reduced variance allows for more reliable observation of subtle magnetic behaviors, enabling precise determination of parameters such as exchange interactions and anisotropy. This, in turn, facilitates improved control and optimization of the quantum annealing process by ensuring the system operates according to the intended Hamiltonian and minimizes errors in qubit state manipulation.

Calibration of flux bias offsets using 3000 gradient descent steps and 3000 samples per iteration successfully reduced the variance of single-site magnetization across the antiferromagnetic qubit lattice, balancing the statistic as intended.
Calibration of flux bias offsets using 3000 gradient descent steps and 3000 samples per iteration successfully reduced the variance of single-site magnetization across the antiferromagnetic qubit lattice, balancing the statistic as intended.

Revealing Magnetic Order: Domain Walls and NĂ©el Order

The interplay between magnetic order and domain wall formation was directly investigated in one-dimensional antiferromagnetic rings and extended to two-dimensional grids. These boundaries, regions where the magnetic orientation transitions, aren’t merely defects but active participants in defining the overall magnetic state. Simulations revealed that the arrangement and behavior of these domain walls profoundly influence the emergence and stability of antiferromagnetic order within the material. In essence, the system doesn’t simply have magnetic order; the order arises dynamically from the complex interactions and configurations of these internal boundaries, demonstrating a crucial link between topological defects and fundamental magnetic properties.

The implementation of open boundary conditions within a two-dimensional grid proved crucial for revealing complex magnetic arrangements. Unlike periodic boundaries which enforce symmetry, open boundaries allow for the emergence of edge effects and the stabilization of unconventional magnetic states. This approach enabled researchers to observe a variety of distinct magnetic configurations, including those with non-collinear spin arrangements and localized magnetic moments at the grid’s edges. These configurations, unattainable under periodic boundary conditions, demonstrate the significant influence of surface effects on the overall magnetic order and provide a more realistic representation of magnetic systems found in real-world materials. The resulting magnetic landscapes, characterized by varied spin orientations and domain structures, highlight the importance of boundary conditions in controlling and tailoring magnetic properties.

Direct confirmation of antiferromagnetic order arises from precise measurements of staggered magnetization and the spin structure factor. These analyses reveal a distinct magnetic order parameter, showcasing the emergence of stable antiferromagnetic states within the material. Specifically, peaks observed in the magnetic structure factor serve as a key signature of this ordered phase, indicating a preferred alignment of spins in an antiparallel fashion. The data, gathered with an annealing time of 11.2 ÎŒs, provides a clear and quantitative demonstration of this magnetic ordering, offering insights into the fundamental properties of antiferromagnetic materials and validating the theoretical models used to describe their behavior.

Hysteresis cycles on one-dimensional antiferromagnetic rings reveal that domain wall density, particularly of spin-down walls, varies predictably with applied field and is influenced by both processor size and the parameter Γ/J, while the odd number of spins ensures at least one pinned domain wall always exists.
Hysteresis cycles on one-dimensional antiferromagnetic rings reveal that domain wall density, particularly of spin-down walls, varies predictably with applied field and is influenced by both processor size and the parameter Γ/J, while the odd number of spins ensures at least one pinned domain wall always exists.

The research meticulously presented operates on the principle that a demonstrable phenomenon-in this case, antiferromagnetic hysteresis-must arise from a fundamentally correct model. This aligns perfectly with the conviction that true understanding stems from rigorous mathematical foundations. The ability to simulate magnetic ordering and domain wall dynamics on a quantum annealer, and to observe quantities like the NĂ©el order parameter and magnetic structure factor, isn’t simply about achieving a ‘working’ result. As Richard Feynman stated, “The first principle is that you must not fool yourself – and you are the easiest person to fool.” The demonstrated simulation isn’t merely an approximation; it is a validation of the underlying physical model, rigorously tested and demonstrably correct, reflecting a commitment to demonstrable truth over empirical observation alone.

Beyond the Simulated Field

The successful mapping of antiferromagnetic hysteresis onto a quantum annealing architecture, while demonstrably achieving a correspondence with expected behavior, merely highlights the inherent limitations of analog computation. The observed quantities – spin structure factor and NĂ©el order parameter – are, after all, approximations of a continuous physical system forced onto a discrete substrate. The elegance of the simulation resides not in its fidelity, but in the demonstrable emergence of meaningful physical signatures despite this fundamental compromise.

Future work must address the question of systematic error. How do the limitations of the annealer’s connectivity and precision distort the underlying physics? A rigorous analysis, perhaps leveraging the very mathematical tools used to define the original physical problem, is required to quantify these distortions. Heuristics, such as specialized problem embeddings, are expedient but offer no true path toward a provably correct solution.

Ultimately, the true value of this work lies not in simulating known physics, but in probing the boundaries of what can be efficiently represented on these emerging computational platforms. The exploration of more complex magnetic structures, incorporating long-range interactions or dynamic domain wall behavior, will inevitably reveal where the mathematical purity of the model diverges from the imperfect reality of the hardware. It is in these discrepancies that genuine innovation resides.

Original article: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2511.17779.pdf

Contact the author: https://www.linkedin.com/in/avetisyan/

See also:

2025-11-25 18:55