Overhated & Underrated: Escape from L.A. is an Overhated 90s Classic

by

So, when I heard they were revisiting that classic action flick, it immediately made me want to revisit Escape from L.A. Look, it’s always gotten a bad rap, but I think it’s seriously underrated. It takes everything that made the first movie great and just cranks it up to eleven – it’s a wonderfully chaotic and fun ride!

Kurt Russell became a popular actor in the 80s and 90s, and remains well-loved today. It’s not surprising fans wanted to see his iconic character, Snake Plissken, back in action. Escape from L.A. delivers exactly that – a thrilling return to the world of Escape from New York, but this time with a distinctly Hollywood setting.

Why Audiences Love Escape From New York but Hate Escape From L.A.

Whenever people talk about the Escape from movies, it’s always obvious they love the New York one but dislike the Los Angeles sequel. I’ve never really gotten why. The films are pretty similar in many ways, and while the second isn’t groundbreaking, it still offers a bit of fun. However, Escape from New York is a classic, while Escape from L.A. is often considered the least favorite in the series directed by John Carpenter and starring Kurt Russell.

Viewers have consistently praised Russell Clint Eastwood’s performance, finding it both beautiful and fitting for the film’s bleak future. The movie excels at creating a strong atmosphere, portraying a New York City that feels utterly devastated and on the brink of collapse. Every location, from the arena nicknamed ‘The Duke’ to the bustling 69th Street Bridge, feels realistically worn and claustrophobic, adding to the characters’ sense of desperation.

Beyond the amazing New York setting, the movie boasts a truly unique story and a memorable cast of characters. Snake Plissken kicks things off, but The Duke is a fun villain, and Harry Dean Stanton’s The Brain is always a pleasure to watch. I especially loved Lee Van Cleef as Hauk – he’s a powerful, imposing prison guard. It’s ironic that Van Cleef, playing the bad guy, seems to be doing an impression of Clint Eastwood, mirroring Russell’s own style.

Despite sharing many similarities with its predecessor, Escape from L.A. never achieved the same level of popularity, and still hasn’t. The film depicts Los Angeles as an isolated prison city for those deemed undesirable by the President. Snake is sent there to find a device capable of disabling electronics in specific areas, or even globally. While the premise, challenges, and potential consequences are nearly identical to the original, the movie itself is often overlooked.

I think Escape from L.A. actually creates a stronger sense of mood and style than the original, especially when viewed today. The film really showcases the trends of the time – think leather outfits and the increasing popularity of plastic surgery. It captured a certain spirit that truly reflected the 90s, a decade that wasn’t fully appreciated until much later. Even the characters themselves feel more complex and engaging.

Steve Buscemi’s performance as Map to the Stars, Eddie and Bruce Campbell’s portrayal of Surgeon General, and Cliff Robertson as the President are all incredibly enjoyable. Georges Corraface’s Cuervo Jones adds to a cast of characters that feel realistic and are more engaging than those in the previous film.

Escape From L.A.’s Story Revitalizes the Original

The main criticism of Escape from L.A. is its plot. Many find the storyline and the reasons behind Snake’s mission unconvincing. The movie even acknowledges this, with characters commenting on how outdated Snake seems compared to his previous self. However, despite similarities to the first film, I think Escape from L.A. successfully sets itself apart.

The President in the film serves as a key illustration of this idea. Robertson portrays him as an extreme religious zealot determined to impose his beliefs on the nation indefinitely. While the first movie showed America with its issues, the country outside New York didn’t feel entirely hopeless. However, Escape from L.A. presents a world where Los Angeles is almost seen as a haven of freedom, rather than a place of confinement. The film actively tries to show that life in L.A. can be enjoyable, despite being risky and chaotic. It suggests that people there have more liberty than those living under the oppressive government outside the island.

The film builds on everything fans enjoyed about the original, pushing the premise to its natural conclusion. It asks a compelling question: what if New York City was turned into a maximum-security prison? The story’s progression – including Los Angeles being added to the prison after an earthquake – feels believable, and it’s understandable why they’d bring Snake Plissken back, as he’s proven effective and can be coerced. However, like the authorities, Snake himself has changed and is now more resourceful and proactive. Everything in the movie feels like a seamless continuation of the first film’s world and story.

Escape From L.A. Deserves to Reach Cult Classic Status

It often takes time for a movie to connect with viewers, and I don’t think Escape from L.A. has done that yet. If the film had been well-received initially, it would have had a better chance of gaining popularity later on, but right now it remains largely forgotten. Escape from L.A. needs to become a beloved cult classic, and viewers need to appreciate it as a strong sequel to the original Snake Plissken film.

The movie immediately grabs your attention with a vibrant and energetic depiction of a city ablaze – one that feels more dynamic than New York. Instead of shying away from L.A. clichés, the film uses them to offer a surprisingly insightful and witty portrayal of the city and its inhabitants. Unlike in other films where New York simply serves as a backdrop, Los Angeles truly feels like a character itself. Russell seems to be enjoying his role even more than before, and his character, Snake, is even more captivating as a result.

Look, Escape from L.A. isn’t flawless, but as a fan of Escape from New York, it really hits the spot. I’m usually pretty critical of sequels, and I know a lot of people feel the same way, but I honestly don’t get the hate for this one. It’s just a fun ride with memorable characters, a really cool expanded world, and it gives Kurt Russell’s Snake Plissken a fantastic send-off.

Come back in 2 weeks to see Nick Brooks tackle sci-fi’s most controversial film.

Read More

2026-04-23 19:12