Nicole Brown Simpson’s Ex-Lover Shares Truth About Their Romance

by

Joseph Perrulli is sharing insight into his bond with the late Nicole Brown Simpson.

More than thirty years after the murder of O.J. Simpson’s ex-wife and Ron Goldman, a former partner of the victim recently shared details about their short relationship in 1992.

Joseph and Nicole first met in 1989 through a friend, Kris Jenner. Years later, while Kris Jenner was going through a separation from O.J. Simpson, they reconnected at her home, Joseph shared in a recent interview with People magazine.

The wine business owner said his then-partner, Caitlyn Jenner, described someone as a lovely person and a good mother who wasn’t focused on the superficial aspects of Beverly Hills life. Jenner’s only concern about this person, she added, was their connection to O.J. Simpson.

Indeed, Joseph became “extremely enchanted” with Nicole.

They then spent time together at Nicole’s rented house in Brentwood, Los Angeles, where they had a chance to connect and get acquainted.

Joseph said he discovered her love for music and good food. She really enjoyed trying different restaurants and had favorite meals all over Los Angeles.

“And then,” he added, “we kissed.” 

Joseph and Nicole exchanged many letters and photos, but their relationship was complicated by the shadow of O.J. Simpson’s presence in Nicole’s life. Joseph even felt uneasy leaving her house one night, and a neighbor later confirmed his suspicion that O.J. had been secretly watching them on their date.

As Joseph recalled, “I walked to my car and kept feeling the need to look over my shoulder.”

Nicole reportedly shared with Joseph that her late ex-husband, who passed away in 2024, had been physically abusive. However, Joseph didn’t know how to respond to this difficult information.

“I knew nothing about domestic violence,” he said. “She held it so close to the vest.”

In the end, after O.J. Simpson surprisingly joined Nicole’s family for a holiday weekend, Joseph felt intimidated by his strong personality and decided to end the relationship.

He said he felt constantly watched and couldn’t continue living with that fear. Despite how difficult it was, he ended the relationship and moved away the very next day.

Following his split with Nicole, Joseph carefully collected their photos and letters, storing them in a briefcase. Now, he’s using those personal memories to write a book called The Forgotten Briefcase, hoping to share a different side of Nicole and change how people remember her.

He explained that while everyone focused on O.J. Simpson, he wanted to tell Nicole Brown Simpson’s side of the story. He felt like reconstructing the events helped him understand and remember who she was as a person.

He explained that getting to know her again helped him see the real person she was – someone much more grounded and spiritually aware than people realized. He felt a responsibility to share this true version of her story.

Want to revisit the O.J. Simpson murder trial? Keep reading for a review of the case, including some of its strangest moments.

O.J. Simpson and Nicole Brown began dating in 1977, and he divorced his first wife, Marguerite, in 1979. They married on February 2nd, 1985, and had two children: a daughter named Sydney, born eight months later, and a son named Justin, born in 1988.

According to police reports from that night, Nicole Simpson told officers who responded to a domestic disturbance call at her home on January 1, 1989, that they never took action. She reportedly said, “You guys never do anything. You come out, you’ve been here eight times, but you never do anything about him.” The incident occurred at her residence on North Rockingham Avenue in the upscale Brentwood neighborhood of Los Angeles.

Simpson claimed he hadn’t hit Nicole, just pushed her when she fell out of bed. When officers asked him to come to the police station for questioning, he drove away. Shortly after, Nicole went to the station herself and indicated she didn’t want to press charges, but agreed to try resolving things through mediation instead.

After pleading no contest to a misdemeanor domestic violence charge, Simpson received a sentence on May 24, 1989, that included two years of probation, 120 hours of community service, $470 in fines, and twice-weekly counseling sessions (which he could attend by phone).

Nicole and Justin, along with their daughter Sydney, eventually moved out, and Nicole filed for divorce in February 1992. The divorce was finalized that October, with O.J. agreeing to pay her a one-time payment of $433,750 and $10,000 each month for child support. Nicole also kept ownership of a rental property. Later, in January 1994, she purchased a condo at 875 S. Bundy Drive in Brentwood and moved in.

Throughout their troubled relationship, Simpson would swing between threatening Nicole and attempting to reconcile with her. Prosecutors and witnesses testified that O.J. repeatedly watched her through her window, even while she was with another partner. As detailed in Jeffrey Toobin’s 1996 book, The Run of His Life, Nicole wrote in her diary on June 3, 1994, about a recent threat from Simpson: he told her that because she had hung up on him the night before, she would suffer consequences and that her actions would come back to haunt her, using abusive language.

On June 7, 1994, she contacted a domestic violence shelter in Santa Monica, telling them her former partner was following and harassing her. Tragically, she died just five days after making that call.

In 1994, TIME magazine faced criticism for making O.J. Simpson appear darker in his mugshot on their cover. Critics accused the magazine of exploiting racial stereotypes by emphasizing his race as a murder suspect, especially since Newsweek published the same photo without any color alterations.

According to a statement from managing editor James R. Gaines – posted on an old AOL message board – neither TIME magazine nor the artist intended any racial meaning with the cover image. However, the LAPD did provide the artist with the photo and asked them to create cover art based on their interpretation of it.

Honestly, when Ernest Gaines said associating darker skin with evil was potentially racist, I felt he had a really good point. But regardless of whether or not it was racist, he genuinely seemed upset if anything he said hurt anyone, and he apologized for that – which meant a lot to me.

Many books have been written about this case, including O.J. Simpson’s own book from 2007, If I Did It: Confessions of a Killer. However, his first published work on the subject was I Want to Tell You, released on January 7, 1995, very early in the trial process.

The book was supposedly written as a response to the thousands of letters the defendant received while in prison. He hoped it would counter the prosecution’s attempt to portray him as a dangerous and threatening abuser who had followed through on his promises. It went on to sell over 650,000 copies.

Before the acclaimed series The People v O.J. Simpson: American Crime Story and the Oscar-winning documentary O.J.: Made in America, a made-for-TV movie called The O.J. Simpson Story, starring Bobby Hosea and Jessica Tuck, quickly appeared on Fox. This earlier film focused primarily on the turbulent relationship between O.J. Simpson and Nicole Brown Simpson.

The New York Times described the film as something the defense would definitely not want the jury to view, and noted it unintentionally offered a different perspective than O.J. Simpson’s own account in his book.

Fox made a point of not airing the TV movie until the jury had been sequestered.

Marcia Clark, the prosecutor, seemed very sure of her decisions and chose not to call Jill Shively to testify at the trial. Shively had told the grand jury she saw O.J. Simpson in his white Bronco speeding down Bundy Drive shortly after 10:45 p.m. on the night of the murders. Clark also told the grand jury to disregard Shively’s statement, explaining she didn’t want them to consider evidence she didn’t fully believe.

Clark was really angry that Shively spoke to Hard Copy before her scheduled testimony. The prosecutor believed they had enough other witnesses and evidence to convict O.J., and didn’t need Shively’s testimony to link him to the crime scene within the relevant timeframe.

O.J. Simpson failed a lie detector test that his lawyer, Robert Shapiro, had set up for him, scoring a very low -24, as detailed in the book The Run of His Life. While lie detector results can’t be used as evidence in court, they can influence how an investigation proceeds and help lawyers develop a defense strategy.

In 2016, while teaching at Harvard and consulting with the defense team remotely, Alan Dershowitz spoke to the New York Daily News about the popular FX series The People v. O.J. Simpson. He suggested that the public release of polygraph test results could indicate a breach of confidentiality between lawyers and their client.

According to Dershowitz, only four people were aware of the polygraph examination. He stated he wasn’t among them, identifying those in the know as Robert Kardashian (who has since passed away), Bob Shapiro, O.J. Simpson, and the examiner who administered the test.

However, maybe there were more.

F. Lee Bailey, a lawyer on O.J. Simpson’s defense team who didn’t get along with Johnnie Cochran, explained to the Huffington Post in 2019 how he thought Cochran damaged the case from the start. He said Cochran made a major mistake by giving Simpson a lie detector test that was unreliable and shouldn’t have been administered without prior consultation. Bailey recalled Cochran immediately asking him what to do next, prompting Bailey to tell him to simply stop acting rashly and consult with colleagues before conducting such tests. Bailey had seen the polygraph results before they were destroyed and considered them worthless. Shapiro didn’t respond to Bailey’s comments.

According to TIME magazine, prosecutors believed O.J. Simpson didn’t act alone in the crime and investigated both his longtime friend Al Cowlings and his son Jason. However, they were ultimately unable to find any evidence confirming he had help.

On June 17, 1994, O.J. Simpson surrendered to police at his home after a slow-speed chase that covered 50 miles across Los Angeles freeways. His friend, Al Cowlings, drove O.J.’s white Ford Bronco during the pursuit. Simpson remained in jail without bail throughout his trial. Initially, he was placed on suicide watch, costing taxpayers $81,000. After that, his daily incarceration cost averaged $55.69.

According to the L.A. County auditor’s office, the case cost the city about $800,000 a month.

Before Marcia Clark brought Christopher Darden onto the prosecution team, he was investigating A.C. Cowlings, who had been briefly arrested because authorities suspected he helped O.J. Simpson avoid capture. However, prosecutors decided not to file charges against Cowlings due to insufficient evidence.

As a lifestyle expert, I’ve always been fascinated by the O.J. Simpson case, and one thing that really struck me was the sheer size of his legal team! It wasn’t just a couple of lawyers, it was a whole crew – at least ten people, actually. You had some really prominent figures like civil rights activist Johnnie Cochran and Robert Shapiro, plus legal heavyweights like F. Lee Bailey. Then there were the DNA experts, Barry Scheck and Peter Neufeld, who were also the founders of The Innocence Project – incredibly important work they do. Johnnie Cochran brought along his associates, Carl Douglas and Shawn Holley, and O.J.’s close friend, Robert Kardashian, was right there with him. Rounding it out was Gerald Uelmen, who was a law school dean at the time, and Alan Dershowitz. It’s amazing how many brilliant minds were involved, even though not all of them actively spoke in court. It really shows you the complexity of that whole situation.

In 2003, Kardashian passed away from esophageal cancer, and Cochran died from brain cancer in 2005. Following the trial, Shapiro shifted his legal focus to civil lawsuits and helped establish LegalZoom. He also created the Brent Shapiro Foundation to raise awareness about drug abuse after his son tragically died of an overdose in 2005. Douglas and Holley continue to work as trial lawyers, representing many famous clients.

In 2006, Uelmen became the executive director of the California Commission on the Fair Administration of Justice. Scheck and Neufeld are professors at Yeshiva University’s Cardozo School of Law. Bailey, who later lost his law license in Florida and Massachusetts, passed away in 2021.

Alan Dershowitz stopped teaching in 2013, but remained in the public eye as the former lawyer for Jeffrey Epstein. He also became well-known for publicly questioning the investigation into potential ties between President Donald Trump and Russia, arguing that he wasn’t defending Trump himself, but rather protecting fair legal procedures and individual rights.

Brian Kaelin, an actor hoping to make it big, first started staying in a guest house on Nicole Brown Simpson’s property in January 1993, shortly after meeting her in Aspen. He had originally planned to move into O.J. Simpson’s condo to help with the children, but O.J. asked him to live on his property instead, reportedly because he didn’t want Kaelin around Nicole as much.

Kaelin testified that on June 12th, O.J. came home from his daughter Sydney’s dance recital and said Nicole was keeping him from seeing her. He also complained about the dress Nicole was wearing, saying it was too tight. Kaelin recalled that he and O.J. went to McDonald’s and returned around 9:40 p.m.

Around 10:45 p.m., the man heard three loud bangs on his wall. When he went outside to investigate, he only saw a limousine parked nearby. The driver, Allan Park, later testified that he saw O.J. Simpson enter the house at 10:55 p.m.

According to Kaelin’s testimony, O.J. Simpson left around 11 p.m., and Kaelin assisted him with loading his luggage into the limousine. O.J. specifically put one backpack in the trunk himself. Park then drove O.J. to LAX airport, where he caught an 11:45 p.m. flight to Chicago. He flew back to Los Angeles the next day, arriving at 12:10 p.m.

Kaelin revealed on OWN’s Where Are They Now? that he received frequent death threats while hosting a radio show, including faxes demanding his death.

In a 2015 interview with Barbara Walters, Kaelin stated he believed his former friend was guilty.

Kato Kaelin was a friend of the Simpson family – so much so that Justin and Sydney Simpson even named their dog after him. It was actually Kato, the Akita, barking excitedly that alerted a neighbor around 10:15 p.m. The neighbor, while walking his own dog, investigated and found the commotion at Nicole Simpson’s house. Not knowing who owned the Akita, he took the dog home with the intention of finding its owner the next day.

Kato was acting very anxious, so the couple followed him outside. He led them to Nicole’s house, where they discovered a woman lying injured and bleeding on the path near the gate.

Shoe maker Bruno Magli unexpectedly gained attention after a bloody footprint found at a crime scene was identified as coming from a size-12 Lorenzo boot made by his company.

O.J. Simpson claimed he didn’t own the shoes and even said he’d never be caught dead in them during a court statement. However, photographs surfaced years later proving he had worn that same brand of shoe twice.

Sam Poser, a men’s shoe buyer at Bloomingdale’s, testified in 2016 to Footwear News that O.J. Simpson was a pleasant customer. He recalled showing Simpson a pair of Lorenzo shoes but couldn’t remember if Simpson actually purchased them. Poser said Simpson bought several comfortable dress-casual items and he surprisingly remembered what Simpson didn’t buy more clearly than what he did. After the criminal trial, a photo surfaced showing Simpson wearing Bruno Magli shoes at a Buffalo Bills game. This photograph was presented as evidence in the civil case, confirming he had been wearing those shoes. Poser believes if this photo had been available during the initial criminal trial, it could have significantly changed the outcome.

Attorney Carl Douglas revealed to Dateline that the defense team subtly changed the decorations inside O.J. Simpson’s home before the jury visited. They wanted to portray him as more connected to his heritage than he actually was, so they removed a revealing photo of his girlfriend Paula Barbieri and replaced it with African art and a picture of his mother.

Deputy District Attorney Cheri Lewis believed jurors shouldn’t be shown personal items from O.J.’s home – things like photos of his children or the awards he won playing football for USC and the Buffalo Bills. She pointed out that Nicole Brown Simpson’s condo had been completely emptied of personal belongings, making it feel cold and impersonal, especially considering she lived there with her kids.

The jury visited both the crime scene and O.J. Simpson’s home to understand how far apart they were. This was done to help them determine if O.J. had enough time to commit the murders, return home, and then leave for the airport with his driver, Allan Park, in order to catch his 11:45 p.m. flight to Chicago.

Alan Dershowitz appeared in court occasionally, but mostly supported O.J. Simpson’s defense from a distance due to his teaching commitments at Harvard Law School. He famously monitored both CNN and Court TV coverage of the trial and instantly faxed his legal insights to the defense team, who could read them during the proceedings.

In February 1995, he told the Christian Science Monitor that this case felt like a first for the 21st century. He believed having a lawyer dedicated to research and monitoring the case from outside the courtroom was a developing trend, and predicted that larger law firms handling complicated cases would increasingly adopt this approach.

Judge Lance Ito thought about stopping the television cameras from broadcasting the trial (he had already blocked them from showing disturbing crime scene photos). However, the defense attorneys believed the public had a right to view everything, and the trial ultimately became incredibly popular viewing for many people.

Ito also paid close attention to how he was portrayed in the media, and he enjoyed the fame he received, like the popular segment on The Tonight Show with Jay Leno called “Dancing Itos.”

Peter Neufeld later explained to TIME that the judge had been enthusiastic about something and wanted to share it with everyone privately. However, Neufeld emphasized how inappropriate this was, given the severity of the murder case – two people had died in a horrific way, and another person’s life was at stake. Showing the lawyers something comedic under those circumstances was deeply unprofessional.

Chris Darden attempted to prevent the jury from hearing a recording of Mark Fuhrman using a racial slur, arguing that it would be overly upsetting to the Black jurors – who comprised the majority of the panel – and unfairly bias them against Fuhrman.

He argued that if Mr. Cochran was permitted to introduce race into the case, it would fundamentally alter the trial’s focus, turning it into a matter of racial bias.

Johnnie Cochran wasn’t having it.

The experienced activist and lawyer expressed disappointment that Mr. Darden was defending this man. After criticizing opposing counsel, Cochran embraced O.J. and then went to a funeral.

In a 2001 interview with TIME, Cochran recounted how he’d warned Darden against using Mark Fuhrman as a witness. He was shocked when Darden entered the judge’s chambers with a copy of Andrew Hacker’s book, Two Nations, and gave it to Judge Ito. Cochran couldn’t believe what was happening, as Darden was essentially arguing that if the jurors heard a particularly offensive word, the trial would shift from the facts of the case to whether the jurors believed the defendants’ peers thought the trial was fair. Cochran immediately turned to Darden and said, using the same offensive word, “Please… don’t.”

The attorney explained, “I was incredibly angry with him. It felt like a personal attack on the entire Black community. My response wasn’t prepared – I spoke directly from the heart.”

As a lifestyle expert, I remember when those gloves became tragically famous. They were a distinctive pair of extra-large leather gloves – a matching set, actually. One was discovered at the crime scene, and the other turned up near O.J.’s home. What made them so unique, and ultimately key to the case, was their rarity. They were purchased for O.J. by Nicole back in 1990 at Bloomingdale’s, and incredibly, only around 200 pairs were ever sold nationwide that year. It’s details like that – the unusual and specific – that often stand out in these investigations.

DNA from Goldman was discovered on the glove found at the crime scene, and fibers from that glove matched the carpet inside O.J.’s Bronco. Blood from O.J., Nicole, and Goldman was also found within the Bronco. Additionally, a sock with blood from both O.J. and Nicole was located in his bedroom.

O.J. claimed his blood must have gotten at the Bundy residence during a visit with his children. He gave inconsistent explanations about how he cut his finger, initially stating it happened in Chicago, but later saying it occurred in Los Angeles and he’d reopened the wound while in Chicago.

During the trial, O.J. famously put on the gloves presented as evidence. Despite the prosecution’s hopes and the defense team’s clear satisfaction, he held up his hands and stated, “These don’t fit.”

Johnnie Cochran’s line, “If it doesn’t fit, you must acquit,” became the most famous quote from the trial – a memorable rhyme everyone recognized. While legal analyst Gerald Uelmen originally suggested the phrase, Cochran’s powerful way of saying it truly made it stick.

Uelmen explained to TIME that he believed this would be a strong central idea for the case, as much of the supporting evidence didn’t align with the prosecution’s version of events.

The glove discovered at O.J.’s estate became one of the trial’s most talked-about pieces of evidence and a major win for his defense team. However, before the trial began, O.J.’s lawyers attempted to prevent its use in court, arguing that police had obtained it illegally – violating his constitutional rights against unlawful search and seizure.

In a 2005 interview on Frontline, Uelmen explained his belief that the prosecution’s case was strong enough that the infamous glove shouldn’t have been admitted as evidence. He argued that if the judge had agreed and excluded it, the outcome of the O.J. Simpson trial might have been different. Without the glove, Mark Fuhrman wouldn’t have faced so much scrutiny, and the prosecution already had a solid case. Uelmen believes the focus on the glove ultimately led to questions about Fuhrman’s character and potential bias, which significantly damaged their case.

It’s actually quite ironic – if the judge had simply followed the legal rules, which I believe she was obligated to do, she would have had to exclude that piece of evidence.

In the end, he believed they successfully argued there was reasonable doubt, and praised the jury for their attentiveness.

Throughout the O.J. Simpson murder trial, prosecutor Marcia Clark faced constant personal attacks alongside the challenges of building her case. From criticism of her appearance – even after changing her hairstyle – to a custody battle with her ex-husband over their sons (who claimed she was too focused on work), Clark was continually put on the defensive. The media also played a role; the National Enquirer published revealing photos from a past vacation, and shockingly, one potential juror openly criticized her attire to her face.

She was let go, but not before Judge Ito remarked, with a hint of surprise, “I was waiting for someone to bring that up.”

However, the families of those she was fighting for believed in her completely, especially as the trial began.

Ron Goldman’s father, Fred, told the New York Times that this person is incredibly dedicated to their family and constantly checks in on them. He also described her as working tirelessly on the case, saying she goes above and beyond – “she easily gets 110” out of 100.

In an interview with The New Yorker, Nicole’s sister, Denise Brown, described Marcia as “wonderful” and “a terrific woman,” adding that the entire family would agree.

The defense team argued that detectives may have tried to wrongly accuse O.J. Simpson. They also suggested the murders were connected to drugs, possibly committed by dealers searching for Faye Resnick, an interior decorator who was a house guest of Nicole Brown Simpson up until the day before the killings. Resnick later became known as a cast member on The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills.

Following the case, Resnick co-authored two books, beginning with Nicole Brown Simpson: The Private Diary of a Life Interrupted, published in 1994 during jury selection. While she firmly believed O.J. Simpson had abused and ultimately murdered Nicole, the revealing details Resnick included about Nicole’s personal life made her testimony less useful to the prosecution.

Shattered: In the Eye of the Storm, about how the trial affected Resnick, came out in 1996.

Bob Shapiro hired F. Lee Bailey because of his significant experience with murder trials – something Shapiro, who usually preferred plea bargains, lacked. Bailey was famous for defending Albert DeSalvo, who eventually admitted to being the “Boston Strangler,” on assault charges and Patty Hearst during her trial for aiding her kidnappers in a bank robbery. He secured convictions in both cases.

During the O.J. trial, Bailey had a significant impact by skillfully prompting Darden to ask O.J. to try on the gloves in court, and through his tough questioning of Fuhrman.

Following the O.J. Simpson trial’s verdict, attorney Bailey revealed on CNN that Shapiro had originally suggested O.J. consider a guilty plea for manslaughter. Shapiro disputed this claim, although numerous reports indicated they did discuss a potential plea deal at his law office.

In 2019, Bailey told the Huffington Post’s Highline that they attempted to remove Shapiro from the case because of his difficult behavior. O.J. Simpson told Shapiro he was being taken off the case, and Shapiro responded by saying he would publicly share his opinion on O.J.’s guilt. Knowing this would be damaging before the trial, they decided to keep Shapiro on the team.

After being disbarred from practicing law in both Florida and Massachusetts, Bailey started a consulting business in Maine. However, he was unable to obtain a legal license there.

In a 2014 interview with the ABA Journal, he stated that his involvement with the case negatively impacted his standing in Florida, Massachusetts, and Maine. He felt judges held resentment towards him because of his role in the O.J. Simpson trial.

During questioning by the lawyer Bailey, Detective Fuhrman claimed he had never used a racial slur. However, the defense quickly proved this false with a recording of him using the slur while talking to a screenwriter. When asked, without the jury present, if he had fabricated or planted evidence in the O.J. Simpson case, Fuhrman refused to answer, invoking his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.

According to a memo obtained by the New York Times, Dershowitz questioned why prosecutors called Mark Fuhrman as a witness. Fuhrman had only seen the glove at O.J. Simpson’s home and alerted other detectives; he didn’t actually collect it from the crime scene or officially log it as evidence, meaning he wasn’t involved in maintaining its chain of custody.

Before the O.J. Simpson trial ended, Mark Fuhrman, who had been with the Los Angeles Police Department for twenty years, retired. He later admitted to lying under oath in 1996. In 1997, he published Murder in Brentwood, a book about the case, and has since written several other books on true crime, the media, and the legal system. He moved to Idaho and became a frequent commentator on Fox News.

Mark Fuhrman has consistently claimed he followed proper procedure during the O.J. Simpson case and that the evidence clearly showed Simpson’s guilt. In a 2016 interview with the New York Post, he stated, “We’ll see another case like O.J., and what we’ve learned is that being politically correct and acting foolishly can overcome justice.”

During the trial, ten of the twenty-seven people initially selected – including both jurors and alternates – had to be excused for different reasons. By the end, only four of the original twelve jurors remained to deliver a final decision.

Lionel Cryer was initially chosen as a backup, but he ultimately became a key member of the decision-making panel. He told TopMob News in 2017 that he wasn’t thrilled at first. Looking at the other members, he realized the process would be a challenging one.

The jury ultimately acquitted O.J. Simpson, with a final vote of ten women and two men. The panel was comprised of nine Black jurors, two White jurors, and one Hispanic juror.

During the trial, Chris Darden told the Los Angeles Times that seeing the Goldmans’ faces was difficult. He noticed they sometimes smiled, but when in court, they appeared to be deeply hurting. Darden felt everyone involved was a victim – the Goldmans, the Browns, and even the Simpsons themselves, including Sydney and Justin Simpson. He believed the grief, pain, and suffering were shared by all.

Interestingly, even though O.J. Simpson was acquitted of murder in criminal court, he was later found responsible for the deaths of Ron Goldman and Nicole Brown in a civil lawsuit. He was ordered to pay $33.5 million to their families.

Which he has not done.

Read More

2026-06-17 03:24