Britain’s Bank Throws a Party, Forgets to Invite Stablecoins

by

In a move that screams “we’re trying, okay?” the Bank of England has decided to rethink its stablecoin rules after a chorus of crypto firms whined that the proposed regulations were about as welcoming as a tax audit on your birthday. Apparently, strict reserve rules and ownership caps were making pound-backed tokens about as appealing as a raincheck on a sunny day.

  • Bank of England officials, in a rare moment of self-reflection, are reconsidering stablecoin holding caps after crypto firms pointed out that limiting adoption is a great way to kill a party before it starts.
  • The central bank is also second-guessing its reserve requirements, which would force issuers to stash 40% of their assets at the BoE, effectively turning them into the world’s most expensive piggy bank.

According to the Financial Times, Deputy Governor Sarah Breeden-the human embodiment of “cautious”-admitted the bank is reviewing whether temporary holding limits on sterling stablecoins are necessary. She’s also wondering if their reserve rules are more restrictive than a Victorian-era corset. Spoiler: they are.

Under the Bank’s November 2025 consultation paper (because nothing says “we’re serious” like a deadline two years away), individuals would’ve been capped at holding £20,000 of a single UK stablecoin, while corporations got a whopping $13.5 million limit. Because, you know, nothing says “financial inclusion” like treating corporations like whales at a casino.

Officials claimed these limits were to prevent a bank run if stablecoins suddenly became the hot new thing. Because clearly, the biggest threat to traditional banking is people having too much choice.

Meanwhile, the consultation also proposed that issuers park 40% of their reserves in non-interest-bearing deposits at the Bank of England. The remaining assets? Shoved into short-term UK government debt. Because who doesn’t love a good, old-fashioned bailout fund?

Breeden, ever the party pooper, has long argued that stablecoins should meet safety standards comparable to traditional payment systems. Which, let’s be honest, is like demanding a unicycle meet the same safety standards as a tank.

Industry participants, unsurprisingly, pushed back. They pointed out that enforcing ownership caps across trading venues and wallets would be about as easy as herding cats. And forcing firms to park reserves at the central bank without earning interest? That’s like asking someone to pay for the privilege of storing their own furniture.

UK Regulators: Competitive or Just Confused?

As UK regulators fumble through drafting rules for fiat-backed digital assets, they’re also sweating over the possibility that stablecoin activity might flee to more “commercially flexible” jurisdictions. Because nothing says “global financial hub” like being outshone by countries with fewer rules and more sunshine.

Earlier in the week, Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey warned of a potential showdown with the U.S. over stablecoin oversight. Speaking at a conference (probably while clutching a cup of tea), Bailey said global payment use cases would require common international standards. He described future talks with Washington as a “coming wrestle,” which is just a fancy way of saying “we’re in for a world of hurt.”

Bailey, who also chairs the Financial Stability Board, repeated his concerns that some stablecoins might not be redeemable during market stress. Because, you know, the last thing we need is another financial crisis caused by digital Monopoly money.

Meanwhile, the Trump administration (yes, they’re still a thing) continues to back stablecoin expansion through the GENIUS Act, which established a U.S. framework for issuers. CoinGecko data values the global stablecoin market at over $317 billion, with dollar-backed tokens dominating the sector. Because of course they are.

Back in London, lawmakers are finally getting around to examining how the UK should oversee the sector. In January, parliamentary committees heard from industry groups like Coinbase and Innovate Finance, as officials worked on rules to complement future crypto legislation and potential digital pound plans. Because nothing says “we’re on top of this” like starting the race halfway through.

For now, sterling stablecoins are about as popular as a raincoat in a desert. Any relaxation of reserve rules or holding limits could determine whether GBP-backed tokens become viable for payments, treasury management, and settlement, or if firms just keep cozying up to U.S. dollar stablecoins. Because let’s face it, the dollar is the cool kid at this party, and the pound is still trying to figure out the dress code.

Read More

2026-05-14 13:09