Trump Calls Leaders ‘SCUM’-Why America Needs A New Crypto Empire?

In a public display of confidence, President Donald Trump could not resist defending the CFTC’s sole dominion over prediction markets, as though he were the steward of a vast pastoral estate, arguing that the federal‑state rivalry is what keeps the United States on a soil rich in gold when foreign hands clutch the wind.

On the twenty‑sixth of May, he warned that other nations are plotting to drive a wedge between the country and its title as the global Bitcoin capital. In his own slice of melodrama, he suggested that even the quiet markets of tomorrow might betray the nation’s shrewdness.

The CFTC’s Prediction Markets Push

Trump’s post was a direct salute to CFTC Chair Mike Selig, in which he calmly thanked the solitary commissioner who appears to have stolen the spotlight from the remaining four, which, as with all important dramas, adds a touch of theatrical flair.

The argument was that prediction markets, like Bitcoin, are industries where a single clear law may determine whether the nation retains its golden advantage. Kalshi’s recent valuation, $22 billion in a May 2026 round, is proof that even at the same time as parlor games and prudish critics, the market is still opening its doors to institutional players.

Monthly volumes from these markets-surpassing $20 billion, a mountains‑high jump from the prior $1.2 billion-have been met with the confusion of an unregulated wilderness. Yet the legal map of the United States remains unfinished; each state scribbles its own chapter.

In the post, Trump named Chris Christie, Letitia James, Tim Walz, and JB Pritzker as “SCUM,” a charge that now feels as if it came from the pen of a man who occasionally thinks a headline should double as a carrot for his speech choir.

Ms. James, among 38 state attorneys general, joined a lawsuit in Massachusetts against Kalshi that argues the same dregs of regulation apply to everything though the market’s rules are not yet written. Elsewhere, the CFTC has taken legal steps to stop state‑level gaming statutes from spilling into federally regulated spaces in places like Arizona, Connecticut, Illinois, New York, and Wisconsin.

Analysts suggest that, if the suits reach the Supreme Court, the debate may finally settle. Until then, the industry lingers in a fog-a state of limbo that has the paling resonance of a Russian winter over a quiet, unwept stream.

Read More

2026-05-27 09:31