Why TRON Beats Ethereum in Crypto Payments Despite Holding Less Stablecoins

by

<a href="https://pricpr.com/eth-usd/">Ethereum</a> Holds 50% of All Stablecoins: Why TRON Runs the Payments.

Key Takeaways

  • Ethereum stablecoin market cap: $186.2B, over 50% of total.
  • Tron stablecoin market cap: $87.1B.
  • Crypto card spending: $600M per month, up 500% since September 2024.
  • Visa crypto card dominance: 90% of transactions, 130+ programs, 50+ countries.
  • Visa settlement volume: $7B annualized, up 50% quarter over quarter, nine chains.
  • Jupiter Global: 4-10% cashback, 660% month-over-month volume growth in April.
  • ERC20 stablecoin outflow April 29-30: 5.3B, largest single-day outflow of the month.
  • ERC20 stablecoin inflow April 13-14: 5.1B, largest inflow spike of the month.

Two Chain Rankings, One Asset Class

Ethereum currently holds $186.2 billion in stablecoins, representing over half of all stablecoins in circulation. Tron comes in second with $87.1 billion, while Solana holds $15.8 billion. All other blockchains combined account for the rest. In terms of transaction value, Ethereum isn’t just the leading chain – it’s significantly ahead of all others.

Let’s examine crypto card transactions. TRON currently leads the way, with Ethereum as a secondary player. Interestingly, the blockchain handling half of all stablecoin settlements only processes a small portion of everyday card payments. However, the chain holding a quarter of stablecoin value is responsible for most of the card spending, which has seen a remarkable 500% increase since September 2024.

As a crypto investor, I’ve noticed something really interesting about stablecoins. It’s not that rankings are conflicting, but more about how the market is *using* different blockchains. It seems stablecoins have naturally split into two groups based on transaction size – no one officially announced it, but it’s happening. Bigger transactions go to Ethereum because it’s more secure and has a lot of liquidity, so people are willing to pay the higher gas fees. But for smaller transactions – like $10 or $50 – TRON makes way more sense. The fees on Ethereum would eat up too much of the money, while TRON’s almost-zero fees keep things affordable. So, it’s the same money moving around, but depending on *why* it’s moving, it chooses a different blockchain. It’s a pretty clever market solution, really.

TRON’s success in retail payments isn’t about low fees; it’s about how widely available it became. This started in 2019 when Tether launched USDT on TRON, focusing on over-the-counter trading and exchange activity in Asia and developing markets – areas where TRON was already popular for settling transactions. Because TRON became the go-to stablecoin for many crypto exchanges in Southeast Asia, Latin America, and Africa, any payment system wanting to reach those users found that people already had TRON USDT. Creating crypto cards on TRON simply met existing demand, rather than trying to create new habits. While Solana and BSC also have very low fees, they didn’t gain the same level of payment usage, because they didn’t benefit from Tether’s strategic decision in 2019. The blockchain that succeeded in retail payments didn’t win because of superior technology; it won because the world’s largest stablecoin chose it first.

Visa Is Building For Both Layers Simultaneously

In April 2026, people spent $600 million each month using crypto cards, a massive 500% increase from September 2024. Visa processed 90% of these transactions through over 130 card programs linked to stablecoins, operating in more than 50 countries. Visa has also expanded its network to include five new blockchains – Arc, Base, Canton, Polygon, and Tempo – but this isn’t just about offering more choices. It’s how Visa is adapting to the growing division within the crypto space.

Currently, different card networks handle different blockchain technologies: one focuses on TRON for everyday retail payments, while another handles Ethereum for larger, institutional settlements. A network supporting nine blockchains can handle both types of transactions at the same time, eliminating concerns about which blockchain to use for businesses considering adoption. While Visa currently processes $7 billion in on-chain settlements annually – growing at a rapid 50% each quarter – this is still a small fraction (0.05%) of its total $14 trillion in annual payment volume. The goal of expanding to nine blockchains isn’t about current numbers, but about future growth potential.

Visa Expands Stablecoin Pilot to Nine Chains, Adds Base, Polygon, Canton, Tempo and Arc

Visa has expanded its test program for settling payments with stablecoins to include five new blockchains: Arc, Base, Canton, Polygon, and Tempo. This brings the total number of blockchains supported in the pilot program to nine. Visa also reported growth in the volume of transactions being settled directly on these blockchains…

— Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain)

Jupiter Global’s offer of 4-10% cashback, combined with a massive 660% increase in transaction volume during April, shows that real shoppers are using crypto for everyday purchases. These aren’t just crypto fans testing things out – they’re people actively choosing the best way to pay. This widespread shift from users, if it continues to grow, proves that Visa made the right decision in building the infrastructure to support crypto payments.

The 5.3B Outflow And What It Was Buying

Data from CryptoQuant shows that April 29th and 30th saw the biggest one-day decrease in stablecoins held on exchanges during the entire month, with 5.3 billion coins leaving. The previous largest decreases happened on April 14th-15th (4.7 billion) and April 19th-20th (4.5 billion). Throughout April, money consistently flowed into and out of exchanges – first being deposited as stablecoins, and then used to buy other cryptocurrencies, creating a repeating pattern.

The sudden increase in outflows on April 29th and 30th happened at the same time that the price of ETH fell to $2,257 following a statement from the Federal Reserve, and Binance saw $1 billion in rapid purchases within one hour. These two events – the $5.3 billion outflow of stablecoins and the $1 billion in ETH purchases – are likely connected.

The recent decrease in stablecoins isn’t money leaving the crypto market overall, but rather a shift in how it’s held. Funds previously held in stablecoin accounts on exchanges are now being used to buy cryptocurrencies as prices dropped, creating an attractive entry point for investors. The $5.3 billion figure represents this movement – capital transitioning from safe storage to more volatile assets. An analysis of Ethereum trading showed $1 billion in buy orders, and the stablecoin outflow chart confirms this broader trend of funds moving into riskier investments on the same day.

Ethereum’s Moat Is Not Technology

Data from January 2025 to March 2026 reveals that Ethereum continues to dominate the stablecoin market, maintaining over 50% of the share, even with the emergence of faster and cheaper competing blockchains offering significant incentives. While these ‘Ethereum killer’ chains, like Solana ($15.8B) and Arbitrum ($8.3B), have experienced growth, Ethereum’s total value ($186.2B) has increased at a greater rate over the same time period.

As a crypto investor, I’ve been thinking about why Ethereum still dominates stablecoin transfers, and it’s not simply about the tech itself. TRON is way cheaper for small transactions, and Solana is faster for high-frequency trading – objectively. Ethereum’s strength isn’t the technology, it’s the massive liquidity. Every big player using USDC or USDT on Ethereum adds to that pool, making it easier for everyone else to trade. Plus, all the DeFi projects built on Ethereum make holding stablecoins *there* more useful. It’s a self-reinforcing cycle. The real ‘moat’ isn’t the blockchain itself, it’s the huge network of institutions and protocols that have already chosen Ethereum. The more people join, the harder – and more expensive – it becomes for everyone else to move somewhere else.

Solana’s stablecoin value, currently $15.8 billion, is growing at a faster rate than Ethereum’s, even though Ethereum has a larger overall value. This suggests that Ethereum’s dominance isn’t absolute, and attractive alternative platforms can draw in new stablecoin creation. Tron, with $87.1 billion in stablecoins, succeeded by focusing on a different need – quick and affordable retail transactions – and established its own strong user base. Essentially, Solana and Tron aren’t direct competitors; they cater to different parts of the stablecoin market.

The Signal That Separates Genuine Adoption From Incentive Volume

Visa’s recent performance suggests a lasting shift in the stablecoin market, not just a temporary trend. Their annualized settlement volume has exceeded $20 billion in just four quarters, alongside monthly card spending surpassing $1 billion. This indicates that both large-scale settlements and everyday payments using stablecoins are growing at the same time, and Visa’s network is successfully connecting these two parts of the market.

Spending on the platform has stalled below $800 million monthly, even with cashback offers. This suggests people are using it primarily for the rewards, not because they truly prefer it, and spending will likely decrease once those rewards are reduced. Jupiter Global saw a huge 660% increase in April, but this was due to the incentives. The key question now is whether that growth continues in May without the same level of rewards – that will tell us if the platform is gaining real, lasting users or just benefiting from a temporary promotion.

This article is for informational purposes only and shouldn’t be taken as financial, investment, or trading advice. Coindoo.com doesn’t support or suggest any particular investment or cryptocurrency. Before making any investment choices, be sure to do your own research and talk to a qualified financial advisor.

Read More

2026-05-01 11:53