Why Aubrey O’Day Is Happy She Didn’t Testify in Diddy’s Trial

by

Aubrey O’Daydidn’t botch her feelings about her lack of involvement in Sean “Diddy” Combs’ trial.

The singer from Danity Kane, who gained prominence through the reality show “Making the Band” produced by a music mogul during the mid-2000s, was not anticipating being summoned to testify in a federal court case. Nevertheless, she is grateful that she wasn’t required to do so.

In a private conversation with TopMob News, O’Day expressed that he doesn’t yearn for experiences such as testifying in a federal trial, instead, his desires lie in achieving inner tranquility and enjoying a delightful cup of boba tea. He has no desire to find himself on the witness stand during federal trials.

Moreover, the celebrity featured on “Botched Presents: Plastic Surgery Rewind” expressed doubts about her ability to provide useful testimony. She further stated, “This isn’t a scenario where I should be speaking because these are particular crimes.

Eventually, Combs’ trial, where Dawn Richard (a bandmate from Danity Kane) testified, led to convictions for two charges related to transporting someone for prostitution. However, he was found not guilty on three charges of sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy. Despite pleading not guilty to all charges.

Before the verdict was announced, however, Judge O’Day expressed her opinion about what she believed to be a just outcome.

In her interview with TopMob News on June 27, she expressed her desire for justice by stating, “I want him to spend time in prison for all the proven crimes he has committed, as far as I’m concerned.

In a professional sense, I’m hoping the prosecution has done an exceptional job, leaving no room for doubt or questions. Ideally, they would have meticulously linked all the evidence together. My wish is that they successfully prove and convict him for all charges they’ve indicted him with.

The rapper will continue to stay in jail leading up to his sentencing on Oct. 3. During this time, he’ll discover the length of his imprisonment. While the maximum sentence he could receive is 20 years, his lawyer is seeking a prison term between 21 and 27 months, whereas the prosecution suggests a sentence ranging from 51 to 63 months.

Read on to see every revelation from throughout his weeks-long federal trial. 

In my role as a lifestyle expert, I find it fascinating to reflect on recent events involving Sean “Diddy” Combs and his associates. After the court declared him not guilty of racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking charges, it’s essential to consider the reactions from parties involved. Although Cassie Ventura and an unnamed woman (referred to as “Jane”) were found guilty of a lesser charge related to prostitution, Diddy’s legal team has undoubtedly been busy processing the verdicts.

The criminal proceedings against Diddy began when Cassie Ventura bravely submitted her civil lawsuit in November 2023, as Douglas Wigdor stated to TopMob News in a July 2 statement. Although the jury didn’t convict Diddy of sex trafficking Cassie, they found him guilty of transporting someone for prostitution. By sharing her story, Cassie has made a lasting impact on both the entertainment world and the pursuit of justice.

Highlighting the accusations against Combs, which he has denied, Wigdor emphasized once more, “We stand firm behind our client’s integrity. He demonstrated extraordinary bravery during this entire court proceeding.

Wigdor additionally commended Ventura, one of the 34 witnesses testifying throughout the 29-day trial, for her diligence.

He went on to say, “She showed undeniable resilience and shed light on the truth about powerful men surrounding us and the misbehavior that has gone unpunished for many years. This situation demonstrated that change is needed urgently, and we will keep advocating for victims.

After learning that he was found not guilty on three out of five counts in his federal court case, Combs, who potentially faced life imprisonment if convicted on all charges, humbly knelt and bowed his head over a chair in a manner reminiscent of prayer, as reported by NBC News journalists present in the courtroom.

In the role of a lifestyle advisor, I’d rephrase it as: “As a lifestyle expert, I was there in the courtroom today, witnessing the joyous scene unfold. The family of music mogul Sean Combs was seen applauding and cheering for his verdict. An emotional moment ensued, with defense attorneys embracing each other, while Sean himself shared a warm hug with his lawyer, Brian Steel.

On the 2nd of July, a 12-person jury announced their decisions regarding the five federal charges against Combs in his sex trafficking trial. After three days of deliberation, they found him guilty on two counts: transporting individuals for prostitution involving his former girlfriends Ventura and another woman referred to as “Jane.

In the court case, it was determined that Combs, who maintained his innocence on all accusations, was acquitted of one charge related to racketeering conspiracy and two charges involving sex trafficking.

On the eve of announcing their decisions, the jury informed U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian that they were deadlocked on the racketeering charge because of deeply entrenched disagreements. Subramanian urged the jurors to persist in their discussions. A verdict was eventually handed down shortly after deliberations commenced the following day.

Attorney Christy Slavik spoke for a total of four hours and 50 minutes while presenting her closing statements to the jury. During this time, she contended that Sean “Diddy” Combs resorted to using his power, threats of violence, and instilling fear in order to fulfill his desires.

1) “She stated that he never accepts ‘no,'” or more casually, “She mentioned that he’s persistent.”

2) “She pointed out that he rules over his domain,” or more colloquially, “She highlighted that he’s the boss.”

3) “She explained that everyone caters to his needs in his realm,” or more casually, “She clarified that everyone is there to make him happy.”

4) “She conveyed that he doesn’t accept refusals,” or more casually, “She shared that he doesn’t back down easily.”

5) “She observed that his subjects serve him in his kingdom,” or more casually, “She noticed that everyone in his world caters to him.

Slavik referred to Combs’ 2016 physical abuse of his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura, as well as an alleged assault in 2024 involving a woman known as “Jane” during the court proceedings.

Slavik highlighted incidents of violence against two of Combs’ former partners – Cassie Ventura in 2016 and a woman identified as “Jane” in 2024, during their respective trials.

She pointed out that while these two events occurred eight years apart, they aren’t independent narratives. Instead, she described them as consecutive chapters in the same book, chronicling the tale of Sean Combs and the organized crime network he oversaw, comprising his close associates.

On numerous occasions, this criminal organization catered to the defendant’s every whim using a systematic approach of threats, force, and control,” she explained. “The defendant believed his secrecy and societal prestige, including his status, riches, and influence, would shield him from legal repercussions.

As a devoted supporter, I wholeheartedly agree with Slavik’s assertion that Combs was supported by a dedicated team, which he aptly referred to as a “small army.” This team was relentless in catering to the defendant’s every whim, enhancing his power, safeguarding his reputation, and doing so at any cost.

The legal team responsible for prosecution presented documents to Judge Arun Subramanian, asking for changes in certain aspects of their theories concerning an alleged case of attempted arson and kidnapping.

Despite Combs continuing to deal with racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking charges that encompass kidnapping and arson allegations, prosecutors stated in their June 24 letter that they have eliminated instructions pertaining to attempted kidnapping under both California and New York law, attempted arson under California law, and aiding and abetting sex trafficking from the charges.

The government stated that by making the language simpler, they aim not just to tidy up the guidelines, but also to prevent any potential misunderstandings.

Combs told JudgeSubramanian that he will not take the stand during his sex trafficking trial.

As a lifestyle connoisseur, I’d like to share an insightful point emphasized by a judge: “Regardless of whether or not a rap mogul chose to testify, it’s crucial to understand that neither the jury nor anyone else can infer or suspect guilt based solely on this decision.

Combs made it clear that the decision not to testify was entirely his own, as he had discussed it with his team.

He stated to the judge, “After extensive deliberation, I’ve made up my mind about it.

Teny Garagos, the defense attorney for the accused, informed the judge that both their team and the prosecution anticipate spending “a minimum of four hours” each during their final statements.

After Special Agent Joseph Cerciello from Homeland Security Investigations concluded his extended testimony on June 24 as a prosecution witness, the defense will now present their case. The legal team representing Combs has stated that they will not call additional witnesses but rather concentrate on the already presented evidence.

On June 23, the jury was presented with graphic videos during Ceriello’s testimony, which seemed to originate from Diddy’s “warm-ups” or rehearsals, as reported by NBC News journalists in court, and these videos were subsequently admitted as evidence.

As your trusted lifestyle guide, I’d like to share an interesting observation I made during my recent research. Over the course of 2021 and 2022, I uncovered approximately 50 explicit videos that caught my attention. During the presentation of this material to jurors, a unique setup was utilized: each juror was equipped with headphones and screens, allowing them to closely examine two specific files.

In the voicemails to his previous chief of staff, Kristina Khorram, dated June 23, Combs outlined various demands made during his hotel stay in November 2021. Among these requests were a replenishment of baby oil – an item he frequently needed for “freak offs.

He asked Khorram to give him a call when they’re about to leave, and he exclaimed that he couldn’t believe he was out of stock. He then stated that he put twenty bottles into the cooler.

Or more colloquially:
He told Khorram to call him once they start heading over, and man, he can’t believe he ran out! So, he stuffed 20 bottles in there.

Apart from Khorram deciding to stay at the hotel for another day, she responded, “Alright. The baby oil is placed just outside the door.

Through a group text, it was revealed that his ex-employee had mentioned she was setting up an IV drip for both him and Jane, which he apparently utilized during at least one of his “recovery” sessions from “freaking out”, as suggested by the text conversation.

She also made sure that there were Plan-B pills, an emergency contraceptive, in his nightstand.

In this scenario, the jurors got to see a sequence of text conversations exchanged between Combs and Ventura. During these exchanges, the artist known as “Long Way 2 Go” openly discussed the impact that the alleged mistreatment she experienced was having on her.

After Combs inquired if Ventura, whom he had an on-again, off-again relationship with from 2007 to 2018, suggested a break in March 2017, she responded, “No. I simply don’t want to be mistreated for being strong-willed or any time. You make me feel insignificant.

In another instance, she further accused her ex of physically assaulting her. 

Ventura wrote to him in May, “I offer you love, but when I momentarily look away, you quickly get into trouble, pulling me down the hallway by my hair. I’m 30 years old. This isn’t a game anymore. Last night, I felt like I was already deceased, and it wasn’t happening to me; it was just so breathtakingly beautiful to witness your radiance.

Brendan Paul, who worked as an assistant for Combs from 2022 to 2024, testified that he bought illegal substances like marijuana, 2C, cocaine, ketamine, and ecstasy on several occasions for his superior.

In Paul’s words, “We would communicate with the drug dealer via text messages, and then he would visit one of our homes.” He added that these connections were made either through text messages or phone conversations.

However, Paul vehemently denied being a “drug mule” for the rap mogul.

On June 18, Judge Subramanian temporarily halted proceedings in the courtroom because one juror was absent due to illness. The court did not convene on June 19 as it was observed as Juneteenth.

The judge announced that one of our jurors has taken ill and experienced dizziness, causing them to return home. We received word from their partner about this situation. As a result, they are absent today, and since they serve on the regular jury, it seems we must postpone proceedings for now.

The judge observed that it’s uncertain if the juror’s sudden bout of vertigo, characterized by feelings of dizziness, nausea, headaches, and additional symptoms, is short-lived or a persistent problem. However, they will keep a close eye on the situation.

Since the court was closed on June 19 for Juneteenth, Judge Subramanian announced that the trial would restart on June 20, with a shorter schedule, lasting from 9 a.m. to 1 p.m.

Not long after Judge Subramanian dismissed Juror Number 6 due to inconsistencies regarding their home address, another juror could be at risk of dismissal due to an alleged inappropriate discussion about the case with a former workmate. The juror under scrutiny has been asked questions by the judge and requested to surrender their phone for examination, as reported by NBC News.

By the close of the court session on June 16, no determination had been reached regarding the member’s termination.

On June 13, Kanye West, known for his hit “Stronger,” showed up at a New York City courthouse to stand by Combs. Although he was inside the building for roughly half an hour, he didn’t step foot into the courtroom itself. The main room is reserved exclusively for Combs’ family, legal team, journalists, and those eager spectators who queue for hours to secure a seat.

Jane remembered the dispute that ensued following her visit to Las Vegas with another rapper and his spouse.

During the trip, she stated that events unfolded resulting in observing explicit acts between a sex worker named Anton (someone they frequently employed) and a woman in a hotel room, with a crowd looking on. This was an incident of sexual peeping.

Jane communicated to Geragos, Combs’ lawyer, that the rap magnate felt distressed following his allegation that she had been at another man’s “lewd gathering.

On the 21st day of the Combs’ trial, I, a dedicated follower of the proceedings, understood that my colleague, Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey, expressed their intention to dismiss one of the twelve jurors.

She informed Judge Subramanian before the jury entered the courtroom in New York City, ‘We had strong reservations about including this in our letter.’ It seemed dishonest to the court, which we found troubling and raises significant concerns for us.

As a devoted admirer, I find myself compelled to echo the words of defense attorney Alexandra Shapiro. She gracefully requested a bit more time, specifically one or two days, to meticulously craft her written response and delve deep into relevant case law, all while keeping in mind that Juror No. 6 is among the esteemed Black members of the jury panel.

In response, Judge Subramanian stated that he would “delay making arrangements” concerning the juror until a decision has been reached.

 

On June 10, Jane found herself in a heated discussion with Garagos, who implied that the witness was engaging in sexual activities in exchange for expensive items.

Lawyer Geragos reviewed text conversations between Jane and Combs from November 2021, where it appeared the witness was displeased that the rap entrepreneur was involved with other women. According to these messages, she inquired about whether Combs had gifted the other woman a Chanel bag following their intimate encounter.

Jane said that she didn’t get a Chanel purse from Combs, telling Garagos that she “got trauma.”

When the attorney asked what a Bottega bag was, she replied, “I’m sure you have one.”

And when Geragos asked how much the item costs, Jane asked, “How much does my body cost?”

Jane was granted a 10-minute break following the exchange.

As a faithful observer, I declared in the year 2022 that I strongly suspected Combs to be a connoisseur of a unique lifestyle – one who derives enjoyment from witnessing his partner engage in intimate physical relationships with others, a term often referred to as a “cuckold.” This conclusion was drawn after my exploration into the dynamics of our romantic entanglement.

She explained that her investigation provided a clearer perspective, and she wanted to delve deeper into why they found such joy in observing their partner with other men.

It was suggested that Combs’ frequent requests for “hotel nights,” which bear striking resemblance to Ventura’s “freak offs,” might stem from him exploring his own sexuality.

She testified that “Cucks might harbor a genuine interest they feel embarrassed about personally exploring. Instead, they employ women as proxies to satisfy their curiosity, without directly engaging in the activity themselves.

In my account, I’ve affectionately referred to Paul, a person we frequently sought services from, as “Trifecta.” This nickname is derived from the exceptional synergy we shared in our interactions, reminiscent of the on-court triumphs of notable basketball stars.

“I was Kobe Bryant and Paul was Shaq [O’Neil],” she told jurors. “Combs was Michael Jordan.”

She characterized Paul as “very kind,” pointing out that if she “were in such a situation,” having intimacy with escorts would be more bearable knowing it was with someone who exuded a comforting aura.

Jane stated that the relationship between Combs and Khorram was a source of disagreement or conflict in her romantic involvement with the hip-hop tycoon.

Jane mentioned that Khorram was often by her side. She found it challenging in their relationship because she thought that Khorram held intense feelings towards her, which significantly affected how Sean behaved toward her.

On June 10, Judge Subramanian refused Combs’ legal team’s request for a mistrial. In their motion, they claimed that Ventura and her friend Bryana Bongolan had falsely stated that the rap magnate had dangled Bongolan over the 17th-floor balcony.

In the course of my unwavering commitment to this case, I’ve taken it upon myself to assert that the prosecution has acted unprofessionally. The accusation stems from their alleged introduction of false testimony during the proceedings, which we categorically refer to as “misconduct.

In this court case, the government has provided evidence that they either knew was misleading or should have recognized it as such regarding their accusation against Mr. Combs of hanging Bryana Bongolan from Cassie Ventura’s balcony in September 2016. To ensure a fair trial and prevent an unjust verdict, the court should declare a mistrial.

Jane alleged that the rap mogul had beaten her for hours June 2024.

Jane stated that an argument ensued between herself and Combs, stemming from his association with a woman significantly younger than himself. This supposedly resulted in Jane referring to him as a “predator” and forcefully pushing his head against a marble kitchen counter.

The witness testified that she concealed herself in the main bedroom, and Combs started forcefully opening the door. (Pictures of the damaged door were submitted as evidence.) She claimed that during her attempt to flee, the founder of Bad Boy Records kicked her on the back of her thigh, causing her to tumble down.

She explained to the prosecutor that he had her pinned down with a headlock on the floor, raised her off the ground, and in this position, she couldn’t take a breath. All she wanted was to escape his hold.

Jane shared that she dashed out of the house, concealing herself near a wall outside for around two hours, with the hope that he would depart, but he didn’t. Later on, they went back to his residence, where she huddled in the backyard as a means of self-protection, since Combs is said to have assaulted her.

As a devoted supporter recounting events based on Jane’s testimony, I can say that the conflict intensified when he, allegedly Combs, struck me repeatedly on my back. In court, I described how he began to punch my head forcefully. He also kicked me and hurled abusive words at me. His actions were relentless as he continued to strike me.

She alleged that he told her that she was “trying to take him away from his kids and his family.” 

She declared, “I replied, ‘No, I’m not. Please go away. Go. Stop it,'” she stated. However, he forcefully took hold of her arm and hair, pulling her back towards the house… with his grip on her hair and arm.

Following the alleged attack, Jane stated that she noticed two swellings about the size of golf balls on her forehead, together with a blackened eye.

Jane stated that on March 2023, Homeland Security executed a raid on her home, which was one of several properties owned by Combs at the time. She reportedly contacted Combs’ security chief upon the agents’ arrival, informing them about the incident.

In December 2023, it was claimed that the mogul had threatened to reveal explicit videos of themselves and share them with Jane’s baby’s father.

As Jane and Combs’ connection weakened, she claimed he expressed that he had “no more to gain” or “nothing to risk” by sharing the videos. She later stated, “It was a constant stream of intense phone calls.

Jane sent a message to Khorram concerning their encounter, which was admitted as part of the court records. In her messages, Jane mentioned that Combs was implying he would share the video, where she claimed she was under heavy influence of drugs.

Additionally, she stated that she required “some distance from” Combs as she was attempting to deal with “the aftermath of the pain” he inflicted.

Jane told the court that Khorram assured her that Combs would not use the footage.

During her testimony, Jane stated that certain aspects of Ventura’s November 2023 lawsuit, which ended in a settlement, seemed to resemble her own encounters with Combs.

She informed the jury that she came very close to losing consciousness, and she believes she did faint. She also mentioned there were three particular pages that contained a chilling description of her ordeal.

Jane, having participated in the “hotel nights,” expressed feeling as if she were living through a personal narrative herself. This experience prompted her to engage Combs via text messages for a conversation.

In her response following the lawsuit by Ventura, she expressed that reading it felt distressingly familiar, as if she were reliving her own experience of sexual trauma. She went on to say that she was unwell and the content mirrored her drug-filled days and nights. She implied that he had warned her about this situation, manipulated her, and drove her to a state of mental instability.

The texts went on saying, “I’m utterly appalled, and it feels as if I was compelled to comply with one situation after another.” “Your actions have caused me to question my sanity regarding the sexual distress I’ve been experiencing. I feel deeply violated. This is a clear case of sexual abuse.

As a diligent observer, I secretly referred to Jane, documenting our private discussion without her awareness. This unbeknownst-to-her dialogue was later admitted as evidence, where I expressed to her that “we undertook these actions jointly” and that “this specific moment” was when I felt the need for her “presence.

Jane, unaware she was being filmed, informed Combs that she felt extremely nauseous upon reviewing Ventura’s papers.

Jane shared that during her “Hotel Nights” with Combs and male companions, she usually used ecstasy. However, on one particular night, she chose to abstain from using drugs while engaging in sexual activities with three different men.

She declared under oath that she spent the evening with several gentlemen. Later on, she became ill and had to vomit. Then, Sean appeared and assured her, “Don’t worry, you’ll feel better now. Let’s step outside.

Jane said that at the end of the night, she felt “absolutely terrible.”

18 days into the trial, on June 7th, Combs’ lawyers submitted a request for a mistrial. They claimed that Ventura and Bongolan had falsely testified that Bongolan was hanging over a 17th-floor balcony by the hip-hop mogul.

lawyers for Combs, whose request for a mistrial was rejected by Judge Subramanian, alleged that the prosecution acted improperly by presenting false or dishonest testimony in court.

The letter states that during this trial, the government has provided evidence that was either untrue or they ought to have known it was false, regarding their claim that Mr. Combs hung Bryana Bongolan over the balcony of Cassie Ventura’s apartment in September 2016. Therefore, to prevent an unfair verdict, the court should declare a mistrial.

In a different wording, it can be expressed as follows: The defender claimed that Bongolan was not truthful regarding the event, highlighting certain discrepancies they found in her account. The prosecution is expected to counter on June 9, and the judge will deliver his decision the day after.

Jane stated that starting from April 2023, which was already two years into their relationship, P. Diddy (the rap mogul) started covering her home rent expenses. She disclosed that they had made an agreement a month beforehand, where he would give her a regular financial assistance every month.

On that ‘hotel night,’ I recall it being the time when Sean presented a sort of ‘love agreement’ or ‘arrangement’ between us, which essentially involved him asking about my preferred allowance,” she told the jurors.

month, just moving forward, that’s what he was going to do for me.”

She shared that when discussing the allowance, she mentioned 15,000 while he replied with 10,000. After searching for new living spaces, she chose a larger and more spacious home within her budget, aiming to create a comfortable environment for herself and her child. This new place served as a sanctuary where she could find some equilibrium in their relationship. Previously, she had been pouring all her affection into him, and this move represented a return of something meaningful from him.

According to her claims, as stipulated in the contract, she was entitled to receive funds “without any undue haste or stress, for a period of two years.

Jane openly disclosed that she frequently experienced urinary tract infections and yeast infections nearly every week due to prolonged sexual encounters. To manage these issues, she regularly took antibiotics. Furthermore, she confessed that she sometimes engaged in sex before fully healing from her UTIs, and during “100 percent” of the nights spent in hotels, she often felt pelvic discomfort or soreness.

The witness disclosed that she felt discomfort in her shoulders and back during the sexual encounter. She also mentioned that she was often found either on the very edge of the chair or the bed, assuming a position that he preferred for foreplay with multiple partners.

In spite of the discomfort she felt, Jane chose not to inform Combs about her pain since she preferred “not to suggest any negative vibes.

Instead, she claimed the discomfort was not confined to their shared bedroom. In court, she testified that she agreed to have her nipples pierced as per Combs’ demand, because he asserted that it would greatly excite him and that was his preference in a partner.

She said she removed the piercings because they “snagged and bled and got infected.”

However, she testified that Combs was unhappy with her decision.

Initially, she claimed he didn’t mind the situation. However, as time passed and I took longer to complete the task, I noticed his growing frustration.

She said, “He’d often remark, ‘Where are your piercings? This will be the last time I see you without any body piercings.’

Read More

2025-07-09 22:19